Game 64 Recap: Cardinals 3, Twins 2

Perspective.

So the Twins lost again, and a lot of us are thinking this is The Beginning of the End.  And it could be.  After all, the Twins started the season playing a lot better than any of us had a right to expect, and while we enjoyed it, we were always kind of waiting for the other shoe to drop.

But as I thought about this current losing skid, it occurred to me that a lot of it has come at the hands of some pretty good teams.  They lost three to the Royals, who are in first place.  They lost two of three to the Rangers, who are in second and may very well be in first before too much longer.  And now they've lost two to the Cardinals, who are also in first place.  Now, obviously, if you want to be considered a good team, you have to be able to beat the good teams.  So, the Twins may not be a good team.  But that doesn't necessarily mean they're a terrible team.

For one thing, most teams are going to have a worse record when they play good teams--after all, that's how good teams get to be considered good teams, because the other teams have a hard time beating them.  And I think a team like the Twins is going to have an even harder time beating good teams.  After all, how did they beat teams when they were winning?  By taking advantage of the other teams' mistakes and capitalizing on the opportunities they were given.  A good team, again pretty much by definition, is going to make fewer mistakes and make it harder to capitalize on the mistakes they do make.  So, a team like the Twins is going to have a hard time beating them.

There's one other aspect to it, too, which came up in the game log.  The Twins haven't been hitting well, but when they have hit the ball well, it seems like they've been victimized by a lot of good plays.  Again, that comes from playing a good team.  Most of the time, a good team will have a good defense and will turn balls that might have been hits into outs.

I guess what I'm taking an inordinately long time to say is that it seems to me that the Twins are not playing that much worse now than they were when they were winning.  A little worse, probably, but not a lot worse.  One of the big things that has changed is the quality of the competition.

The good news is that, after this week, the schedule turns back in the Twins favor for a couple of weeks.  Yes, there are four games against the Royals in there, but there are also three with the White Sox, three with Milwaukee, three with Cincinnati, and three with Baltimore.  If the Twins just hang in there and don't panic, there's no reason they can't start winning some games again.

To sum up, things don't look good right now, but all is not lost.  We're not a good bet to make the playoffs, but we never were, not really.  But we do have a shot at hanging around .500, and that would be a significant improvement over last year.

Or, on the other hand, we might win our last ninety-eight games.  Come to think of it, that sounds like a much more likely scenario.  It starts tonight!  We'll just have to settle for 132-30!

9 thoughts on “Game 64 Recap: Cardinals 3, Twins 2”

  1. I noticed that the last few days, even though they were losing, and it felt like they probably would lose, I still wanted to follow the games. They were still a lot of fun. To me, that is the biggest change from the previous few years. Last year they got to be watchable again, after not having even been that. This year, they've gone from watchable to fun.

    1. The cynical side of me has been intoning, "They only brought up Buxton (instead of X outfielder) because they were losing and were concerned about losing the goodwill a great May produced."

      1. Heaven forfend that the club bring up players only because fans would want to pay money to watch them play. 😉

  2. The Twins' overall ERA is 3.93. In June, it's 3.98, so pitching really hasn't been the problem. With Buxton up, hopefully, that'll solve the black hole that was CF. That really just leaves DH, SS and C. Escobar should at least be an improvement on what Santana was doing. If Vargas doesn't start hitting soon, that could lead to Sano being promoted soon so he can either DH or push better hitters to be the DH from other positions. Not sure about C without a trade, at least until Pinto gets healthy and starts hitting again in AAA, but the difference there compared to average is less than the other positions. Hopefully, improving other areas will keep Suzuki/Herrmann down in the lower third of the batting order.

    1. This isn't particularly directed at you, socal, but I don't understand why everyone's so quick to give up on Vargas. He was a good hitter for the two months he was in the majors last year. He had a bad April. He hit very well in the first half of May and hit very well when the Twins sent him to Rochester for three weeks. He's had a whopping twenty at-bats since he came back. He hit well all through the minors. I see no reason he shouldn't hit in the majors if they just stick him in the lineup and leave him there.

      1. ISO Power of .199 in the Minors and a slash line of 289/369/488 in the Minors? Yea, sure seems like he can hit. I'd like to see his patience and eye at the plate return (39:7 K:BB this year in the Majors, vs 68:43 in 405 PA last year at AA).

Comments are closed.