I wouldn't know Kierkegaard from Kant or Koffka. Nonetheless, that is amusing.
I have to confess only a passing awareness of both halves of that match up.
Reading the content there, funny though it was, I think I'm gonna keep it that way...
That is awesome.
Since moving seven games above .500 by completing a sweep of the Orioles on May 24th, they are 24-33, good for a .421 winning percentage that matches their overall mark from the past six years exactly.
The Twins have surprised us, certainly, but as in 2015 we should acknowledge that it's just because of cluster luck. Today the team is 49-51, but their BaseRuns & Pythag is 43-57, just under the .430 mark. Surprise, surprise. The club that made few changes in the offseason is running out the same quality of team that we've been watching for several years, now.
It's a blessing that they've fallen flat as the trade deadline approaches, really, as long as Falvine take it as cover to sell off some assets. Hopefully they get some quality young talent back this week, and then get to work on reshaping the team & organization next winter.
I agree with frightwig's assessment of this recent skid as a blessing. I'd rather the Twins make trades now that drop the team from contention this season but help build a serious, long-term contender in a year or two, rather than going all in on one that nips at the heels of a weak division & the second Wild Card.
I agree. I'm also fairly confident, given how they handled Dozier's situation last winter, that they're not going to make trades just to make trades. If they make a deal, it will be because they truly believe it will do what you say, help build a serious, long-term contender in a year or two.
I still don't know how this all works, so I'm going to take a stab at a random contribution.
I have to write my first blog post for Psychology Today, and I'm having writer's anxiety. I don't know how to start this post on a subject I write about all the time. Do I start in the middle of the story? Do I start at the beginning and potentially bore people wh've read through my previous writing? I have no idea.
It's a blog? Just put a link to your previous discussions for anyone who wants the backstory first.
I've blogged elsewhere about it, but I haven't blogged at Psychology Today about it. So it's reall just my FB/Twitter "audience" who would know about the other writing I've done. The Psychology Today audience probably doesn't.
Ah! well, there are probably policies regarding linking outside their site, too, I suppose.
I guess you should leave them wanting more? The scope is larger, so when you link to an article for your FB/twitter friends, just let them know if
it's rehashing material they've already seen so they can decide if they reread it or not.
MDP - I'm confused*. Are you talking about posting a 'random contribution' to the Worlds Greatest, talking about your writer's anxiety, or is the aforementioned contribution your LTE seeking suggestions about how to kick off your first blog post on Psychology Today?
I don't know what LTE is. The answer to your question may be...both?
TWINS BASEBALL!!
Well, you've certainly nailed down the appropriate times to use the [tb] button
I wish there were more buttons.
Letter to the Editor ... basically, one of these comments. I was wondering if you were looking to,
a) create a standalone post here (WGOM) to talk about your writer's anxiety, or
b) contribute by looking for recommendations about how you might start your post there (Psychology Today)
Both! (Are there different places to post based off intent?)
I think Corn may have been a little confused by your first statement.
I still don't know how this all works, so I'm going to take a stab at a random contribution.
If you're referring to just contributing the Coffee post (which is random by its nature), then yes, this would certainly fit into the daily conversation. However, per Corn's suggestion, you're also welcome to set it up as its own standalone post. I'm guessing you were referring to the former though, and if so, yep, you're in the right place.
Yes, this ↑↑↑
I didn't even know I could do my own post. So the answer: I was contributing to the Coffee post.
typically anyone can put on a fresh pot if no one has in the morning, but they can be scheduled ahead of time
Don't worry, you couldn't. When you sign up, you don't start with posting privileges. Stick was generous with posting privileges so I've tried to maintain that spirit, but the person has to indicate they want to post and be active first.
The Cup of Coffee is a useful place to try things out first. It's common for popular, recurring things to migrate to separate posts. I am pretty sure the movie and book discussions began that way. When in doubt, comment here because everyone else knows to check it frequently.
I wouldn't worry about boring people who have read through the previous writing. If they're reading something you've written again they're probably not bored, and it'll certainly be at least a somewhat differently composed approach to the topic, right? So they'll be getting some fresh content, or the same content, but just in a different way that'll make it seem fresher.
Holy shit, someone let Melissa in! Welcome! Psst...I've been told she's a baseball expert.
Only you and Pete are bigger experts. This has been scientifically proven.
Our total eclipse plans have been ever-evolving over the last few weeks. Originally we were focusing on St. Clair, MO, but after it was one of 20 cities in the center of the path spotlighted in the Astronomy eclipse edition, we turned our attention to Desoto, MO. Word has it that 40,000 people are expected there, and a friend had a small farm on the north side of tiny Hematite, MO, but the lack of a "base station" with AC and bathrooms plus articles describing tremendous traffic problems anticipated, we are now looking at getting together at a friend's house in New Melle, MO. It's not directly on the path center (1:39 minutes instead of 2:40) but at least it's easier to get to (I hope) and more comfortable wait with the typical August weather expected. Now, if we can have clear skies...
If I had made travel plans to get myself into the path of totality, I'd go for the bit of Montana. Nice looking mountain bowl.
I might've settled for nearby Idaho though.
My goal has been to get as many folks to 100% totality as possible. Some people just don't get that 99% isn't "almost as good".
Well, my youngest has day camp that day (until noon). I hope that 86% is just as good as 91% (I had entertained going camping at Blue Mounds that day, but it won't work unless I go solo.
Still got a couple campsites on hold. Unfortunately, the eclipse is on the boy's first day of school, and as there's no way I would attempt to drive back the day of, that means he'd have to miss out on the first two days. As such, it looks like I'm just going to have to invite a bunch of friends instead.
seriously heavy traffic -- allow for lots of time
There are several schools that are actually closing, and those in the path of totality are planning to take in the event.
Mizzou's stadium is going to be packed, and they have a guest speaker or two as well, I believe.
Not doubting that. I've got the sites reserved the day before too.
We are heading to Idaho. We will be helping run and observing event at a scout camp along with my school's astronomy club and some other faculty members. Travel there and back, along with a few days at some national parks and monuments means my 6-year-old will miss 3-3.5 days of school, but seems well worth it for an event like this.
Yeah, I wish the boy could come, but it doesn't work out this time (he's starting 1st grade, so it didn't seem like the right foot to start off on). Thankfully, the exact same spot will be in the path of the next solar eclipse.
I have a feeling that once folks get a taste for 100%, the 2024 event will be well participated. Here's hoping for clear skies for you.
I wonder if the 2024 event will be less popular because it's "only" seven years after the previous total eclipse. The last total eclipse being in 1979, during the winter, and barely covering the US makes for a lot of pent-up demand. I plan on staying here but getting glasses for the kid(s) to use.
don't believe it. those who've seen it will want to see it again (if at all possible) and those that missed out will be planning ahead better this time. you're going to have millions of friends hounding you
I like what the path crosses over a lot more this year than 2024.
I guess I'll hold out for 2044.
If it was the first day like for yours, I would be more hesitant having him skip school. But, he starts August 8, so missing a couple a days a few weeks in doesn't seem that big a deal to me, considering the rarity of it.
holy balls. I leave the country for a week and the place goes to shit.
Dude, that was yesterday. It's already old news.
Interesting question over at Deadspin: which HOFers could have their career split in two, and still have a case as two separate HOF careers?
I was looking at the possible next Hendersonian player earlier today and marveling that the team he joined in his early 30s has, by far, the most WAR from his career.
That would give the Wolves three #1 picks overall from the Cavs.
Not if they send Wiggins back to the Cavs, which is most likely what they would have to do...
The Wolves already sent away Bennett. That isn't what I was noting though. Instead, if Irving is traded to the Wolves then the Cavs will have sent three overall #1s to them.
Getting paid to watch/commentate, that's how. I mean, WE watch/commentate too.
Following up on our cat discussion from the other day, we've got a new addition to our family in Little Miss Steely McBeam. Yes, her previous owners were Steelers fans. She is an older cat. Her previous owner had a cat allergy and decided he couldn't live with it any longer. Trey had been asking about getting a cat and since we knew this was a good cat and pretty calm (and free), we decided we could take her. Of course, Trey was gone this week to camp, so he got a surprise when he got home today.
The ump show continues in Toronto:
Angel Hernandez gets on JA Happ after Happ disagrees with ball 4 to walk in a run, the Jays are not pleased pic.twitter.com/yEYfUV3hBy
Two great things about this clip. First, Pedro calling Hernandez "one of the worst umps in baseball". Second, the catcher Martin staring contemptuously back at Angel and then muttering, "Put your mask back on".
This is the guy who thinks he was discriminated against because he's not a crew chief.
Man .... 'great' doesn't even come close to capturing how freaking awesome both of those things are. I wouldn't have caught what Martin said if you hadn't pointed it out- thanks!!!
I've never had a meatball sandwich at Cafe Du Monde or Morning Call (can't tell from the picture above which one we're in)
That is cafe du monde, fo sho.
Philo, is this yours?
I wouldn't know Kierkegaard from Kant or Koffka. Nonetheless, that is amusing.
I have to confess only a passing awareness of both halves of that match up.
Reading the content there, funny though it was, I think I'm gonna keep it that way...
That is awesome.
Courtesy of Nick Nelson
and a response courtesy of frightwig:
I agree with frightwig's assessment of this recent skid as a blessing. I'd rather the Twins make trades now that drop the team from contention this season but help build a serious, long-term contender in a year or two, rather than going all in on one that nips at the heels of a weak division & the second Wild Card.
I agree. I'm also fairly confident, given how they handled Dozier's situation last winter, that they're not going to make trades just to make trades. If they make a deal, it will be because they truly believe it will do what you say, help build a serious, long-term contender in a year or two.
I still don't know how this all works, so I'm going to take a stab at a random contribution.
I have to write my first blog post for Psychology Today, and I'm having writer's anxiety. I don't know how to start this post on a subject I write about all the time. Do I start in the middle of the story? Do I start at the beginning and potentially bore people wh've read through my previous writing? I have no idea.
It's a blog? Just put a link to your previous discussions for anyone who wants the backstory first.
I've blogged elsewhere about it, but I haven't blogged at Psychology Today about it. So it's reall just my FB/Twitter "audience" who would know about the other writing I've done. The Psychology Today audience probably doesn't.
Ah! well, there are probably policies regarding linking outside their site, too, I suppose.
I guess you should leave them wanting more? The scope is larger, so when you link to an article for your FB/twitter friends, just let them know if
it's rehashing material they've already seen so they can decide if they reread it or not.
MDP - I'm confused*. Are you talking about posting a 'random contribution' to the Worlds Greatest, talking about your writer's anxiety, or is the aforementioned contribution your LTE seeking suggestions about how to kick off your first blog post on Psychology Today?
I don't know what LTE is. The answer to your question may be...both?
TWINS BASEBALL!!
Well, you've certainly nailed down the appropriate times to use the [tb] button
I wish there were more buttons.
Letter to the Editor ... basically, one of these comments. I was wondering if you were looking to,
a) create a standalone post here (WGOM) to talk about your writer's anxiety, or
b) contribute by looking for recommendations about how you might start your post there (Psychology Today)
Both! (Are there different places to post based off intent?)
I think Corn may have been a little confused by your first statement.
I still don't know how this all works, so I'm going to take a stab at a random contribution.
If you're referring to just contributing the Coffee post (which is random by its nature), then yes, this would certainly fit into the daily conversation. However, per Corn's suggestion, you're also welcome to set it up as its own standalone post. I'm guessing you were referring to the former though, and if so, yep, you're in the right place.
Yes, this ↑↑↑
I didn't even know I could do my own post. So the answer: I was contributing to the Coffee post.
typically anyone can put on a fresh pot if no one has in the morning, but they can be scheduled ahead of time
Don't worry, you couldn't. When you sign up, you don't start with posting privileges. Stick was generous with posting privileges so I've tried to maintain that spirit, but the person has to indicate they want to post and be active first.
The Cup of Coffee is a useful place to try things out first. It's common for popular, recurring things to migrate to separate posts. I am pretty sure the movie and book discussions began that way. When in doubt, comment here because everyone else knows to check it frequently.
I wouldn't worry about boring people who have read through the previous writing. If they're reading something you've written again they're probably not bored, and it'll certainly be at least a somewhat differently composed approach to the topic, right? So they'll be getting some fresh content, or the same content, but just in a different way that'll make it seem fresher.
Holy shit, someone let Melissa in! Welcome! Psst...I've been told she's a baseball expert.
Only you and Pete are bigger experts. This has been scientifically proven.
Our total eclipse plans have been ever-evolving over the last few weeks. Originally we were focusing on St. Clair, MO, but after it was one of 20 cities in the center of the path spotlighted in the Astronomy eclipse edition, we turned our attention to Desoto, MO. Word has it that 40,000 people are expected there, and a friend had a small farm on the north side of tiny Hematite, MO, but the lack of a "base station" with AC and bathrooms plus articles describing tremendous traffic problems anticipated, we are now looking at getting together at a friend's house in New Melle, MO. It's not directly on the path center (1:39 minutes instead of 2:40) but at least it's easier to get to (I hope) and more comfortable wait with the typical August weather expected. Now, if we can have clear skies...
If I had made travel plans to get myself into the path of totality, I'd go for the bit of Montana. Nice looking mountain bowl.
I might've settled for nearby Idaho though.
My goal has been to get as many folks to 100% totality as possible. Some people just don't get that 99% isn't "almost as good".
Well, my youngest has day camp that day (until noon). I hope that 86% is just as good as 91% (I had entertained going camping at Blue Mounds that day, but it won't work unless I go solo.
Still got a couple campsites on hold. Unfortunately, the eclipse is on the boy's first day of school, and as there's no way I would attempt to drive back the day of, that means he'd have to miss out on the first two days. As such, it looks like I'm just going to have to invite a bunch of friends instead.
seriously heavy traffic -- allow for lots of time
There are several schools that are actually closing, and those in the path of totality are planning to take in the event.
Mizzou's stadium is going to be packed, and they have a guest speaker or two as well, I believe.
Not doubting that. I've got the sites reserved the day before too.
We are heading to Idaho. We will be helping run and observing event at a scout camp along with my school's astronomy club and some other faculty members. Travel there and back, along with a few days at some national parks and monuments means my 6-year-old will miss 3-3.5 days of school, but seems well worth it for an event like this.
Yeah, I wish the boy could come, but it doesn't work out this time (he's starting 1st grade, so it didn't seem like the right foot to start off on). Thankfully, the exact same spot will be in the path of the next solar eclipse.
I have a feeling that once folks get a taste for 100%, the 2024 event will be well participated. Here's hoping for clear skies for you.
I wonder if the 2024 event will be less popular because it's "only" seven years after the previous total eclipse. The last total eclipse being in 1979, during the winter, and barely covering the US makes for a lot of pent-up demand. I plan on staying here but getting glasses for the kid(s) to use.
don't believe it. those who've seen it will want to see it again (if at all possible) and those that missed out will be planning ahead better this time. you're going to have millions of friends hounding you
I like what the path crosses over a lot more this year than 2024.
I guess I'll hold out for 2044.
If it was the first day like for yours, I would be more hesitant having him skip school. But, he starts August 8, so missing a couple a days a few weeks in doesn't seem that big a deal to me, considering the rarity of it.
For everyone that is interested in the eclipse, make sure you purchase from a reputable dealer.
I just knew that line was coming.
I, for one, am amused that Al Swearengen was apparently hired as the new White House Communications Director.
I thought they hired "that guy".
(In any case, Swearengen is far more eloquent)
Also, kudos to the New York Times for sitting in A.W. Merrick's shoes and publishing the whole thing uncensored.
Dude, that was yesterday. It's already old news.
Interesting question over at Deadspin: which HOFers could have their career split in two, and still have a case as two separate HOF careers?
I was looking at the possible next Hendersonian player earlier today and marveling that the team he joined in his early 30s has, by far, the most WAR from his career.
Ichiro's easily on this list someday.
He's an immigrant. Oh crap...
That would give the Wolves three #1 picks overall from the Cavs.
Not if they send Wiggins back to the Cavs, which is most likely what they would have to do...
The Wolves already sent away Bennett. That isn't what I was noting though. Instead, if Irving is traded to the Wolves then the Cavs will have sent three overall #1s to them.
This is a real thing.
eh. i'd eat it after enough beers.
Me too. Though the name is a bit curious to me.
Getting paid to watch/commentate, that's how. I mean, WE watch/commentate too.
Following up on our cat discussion from the other day, we've got a new addition to our family in Little Miss Steely McBeam. Yes, her previous owners were Steelers fans. She is an older cat. Her previous owner had a cat allergy and decided he couldn't live with it any longer. Trey had been asking about getting a cat and since we knew this was a good cat and pretty calm (and free), we decided we could take her. Of course, Trey was gone this week to camp, so he got a surprise when he got home today.
The ump show continues in Toronto:
Two great things about this clip. First, Pedro calling Hernandez "one of the worst umps in baseball". Second, the catcher Martin staring contemptuously back at Angel and then muttering, "Put your mask back on".
This is the guy who thinks he was discriminated against because he's not a crew chief.
Man .... 'great' doesn't even come close to capturing how freaking awesome both of those things are. I wouldn't have caught what Martin said if you hadn't pointed it out- thanks!!!
Reminiscent of Gary Darling trying to provoke Tom Glavine.