2020 WGOM Draft: Round 27 (Skipper Round)

Special bonus rounds:

--Round 26: Draft someone who played for the Twins
--Round 27: Draft a skipper
--Round 28: Draft a stadium
--Mags drafts all 28 rounds at once

The board

Order:

Philosofer
Algonad
Mike
SoCalTwinsFan
Freealonzo
sean
bhiggum
Nibbish
brianS
CarterHayes
Beau
TheDreadPirate
cheaptoy
hungryjoe
rowsdower

Previous round.

59 thoughts on “2020 WGOM Draft: Round 27 (Skipper Round)”

  1. Well, I figured I should pick one of my favorite people ever to lead a team here. Minnesota born. Led Minnesota teams. Helped teams make improbable comebacks. Made sure the game was about the players, not himself.

    Spoiler SelectShow
    Ok, for real this time SelectShow
  2. His preferred strategy seems to fit in a league this loaded with sluggers. No small ball needed here!

    He also checks off a bunch of the same requirements mentioned above. Only one championship, but definitely looked older than I thought he was; he was only 56 when he retired

    And, if you like a manager who can go down swinging while getting ejected, he's your guy.

    Spoiler SelectShow
      1. These were my top three as well, but I didn’t have the ranking set in stone yet. I also figured I’d probably end up with whichever one was left, so it likely didn’t matter which one I’d prefer.

      2. I hadn't figured out a top 3, given I was picking first, but Weaver would have probably been my pick if not for TK and Sparky got a good look too. I thought a lot about new sabrmetric managers too. Too little track record for them to pick at the top though, I think.

            1. One summer, I entered all the players and their statistics for the 1965 season, and then let "it" simulate all the games. The Cleveland team won the World Series because the Weaver algorithm rode Sudden Sam and Luis Tiant like crazy.

  3. So I went and sorted managers with the most wins all-time and then filtered it with best winning percentage, and came up with

    Spoiler SelectShow

    . Not someone I was familiar with, but I think I would like his style.

    From the wiki:
    He was known for never scolding or shouting at his players and avoiding pep talks in lieu of constructive criticism.[23] Indians owner Bill Veeck commented that his only fault as a manager was that he was "too decent", a description that he took as a compliment.[24] Veeck also said that his "completely relaxed" leadership "squeezed every drop of talent out of his teams".

    Plus, I want to see this kind of manager on my team with Rickey Henderson, Tony Gwynn and Craig Biggio- I know stolen bases aren't that efficient, but I think they're fun!

    Spoiler SelectShow
    1. Star third baseman Al Rosen slumped late in the year while playing injured, and López felt that the Indians' team management had not supported or defended his injured player from fans' booing and criticism. López was so disheartened over the situation that he resigned from the club on the last day of the season.

      Yeah, I like this pick.

  4. I'm going new school. Extremely new school. "Only managed for one season" new school. I like his style, and I like the way he treats his players. He hasn't gone through any losing patches yet, so I guess it remains to be seen how his style plays out at that point, but.....he's not going to lose much with this team, either.

    Spoiler SelectShow
  5. I thought hard about going old school with Leo Durocher, for multiple reasons. When your watch-phrase is "Stick it in his ear!" you are old school. Also, I really liked how he set the stage for Jackie Robinson:

    Before being suspended, however, Durocher played a noteworthy role in erasing baseball's color line. In the spring of 1947, he let it be known that he would not tolerate the dissent of those players on the team who opposed Jackie Robinson's joining the club, saying:

    I do not care if the guy is yellow or black, or if he has stripes like a fuckin' zebra. I'm the manager of this team, and I say he plays. What's more, I say he can make us all rich. And if any of you cannot use the money, I will see that you are all traded.

    He greatly admired Robinson for his hustle and aggression, calling him "a Durocher with talent."

    But I decided to go with somebody less flamboyant and controversial and combative.

    Spoiler SelectShow

    Last manager to manage in street clothes, he was a nice guy who finished first a few times, even if he (like many before him) couldn't quite get over the hump in the World Series vs. the Yankmees.

  6. Baseball wasn't my manager's first career. He played in college, but after graduating he became a high school biology, general science, and industrial arts teacher. He continued playing in a local semi-pro league, pitching and playing the infield corners. A scout for the Cardinals must've noticed, because he was offered a contract to play for a low-level farm club.

    He played well enough to get a cup of coffee the next season, making his debut as a substitute for a future Hall of Famer who had been ejected. It was the only game he played in the majors; his career stats include a strikeout in his sole plate appearance and an error in the field. He spent the next forty years in baseball, but it took him eighteen years in the minors, playing and managing in two systems, to get back to the majors.

    He was hired after his predecessor — coming off a 105-win season and a .642 winning percentage with the club — was ousted during a contract dispute. Once he was in the dugout, he was there for good. His early teams featured veterans with potent bats & shaky pitching, while his later teams relied on excellent pitching & defense. His teams played in three home ballparks, one of which was a nightmare. He won the World Series four times, and a pennant three others.

    Despite being a lame-duck manager for 23 seasons, he wasn't afraid to try new things or change his mind. He partnered with the statistician his Hall of Fame GM hired, diving into statistical information in preparation before each game. He pioneered two revolutions in pitching, first regularizing work loads, and then adopting the first five-man rotation. He favored international walks for a decade, then swore them off. He platooned heavily. Most important for my roster construction, he expertly utilized an excellent super-utility player, and worked with the teams his front office gave him, adapting his managing to suit the roster he had been given.

    Most important of all, he seems to have been a good presence. He broke with the tradition of managers criticizing their players in the press. His reticence and seeming inaction chaffed veterans on his teams early on, as they were accustomed to combative masterminds running the team. Eventually, most of them came to appreciate that he trusted his veteran-heavy teams and simply let the players play. He trusted his coaches and let them make decisions. He kept an even keel during a monumental franchise relocation. He was exceptionally patient when he saw talent that needed time to emerge. He seems to have respected his players for who they were, even the times when he didn't understand them. Most of my players were active during his long career, and he was the first manager to play a majority minority lineup, so I hope he’ll be a good fit for the team.

    As Chris Jaffe said, my pick "never tried to be a genius. Thus he topped almost everyone who thought they were."

    Round 27, Pick 10 SelectShow
  7. I first considered a Japanese manager, but a lot of ones considered all-time greats don't seem to have the managerial style I'm looking for, and Sadaharu Oh was a pretty good manager himself. He can be a bench coach and mentor the rest of my Japanese players.

    I also strongly considered Davey Johnson.

    But I'm going with a guy who has always been known for his ability to manage a clubhouse. With a ton of big personalities I think having someone who can keep things relaxed is crucial. He has been criticized for overworking pitchers and not being on board with new stats, but I think that's a bit overblown. He seems like a really flexible person who is willing to learn. Everyone seems to love playing for him. Plus all he does is win (except for World Series). His first season managing he won 103 games and didn't even make the playoffs.

    Spoiler SelectShow
    1. I considered him- really, really liked him with the Giants and he never seemed to have problems with his players. Managing pitchers though... Well, he's not the only manager to overwork his stars.

  8. Chris Jaffe wrote the book about evaluating baseball managers.* After all, that's its title. I'm going to go with the guy he rated as the best manager of all time. This manager won 7 out of 9 World Series (and only lost 13 World Series games in the process!). This manager managed parts of 24 different seasons with three different organizations. He never once had a losing record for any of those 24 full (or partial) seasons. How is that even possible?

    Actual Spoiler SelectShow

    *Full disclosure: I read draft chapters and provided edits and feedbacks during the process and he incorporated a bunch of my research about the 1969 Twins into his Billy Martin section. Still, if you haven't read it; it's a great book (although probably could use an update to incorporate the last decade of baseball - I don't think Gardy is seven places ahead of Bruce Bochy on the all-time list anymore!).

  9. I much prefer the new school to the old school so I'm going to stick with that and take a guy who seemed to do a whole lot with not a lot and did it in seem weird freekin ways:

    Spoiler SelectShow
  10. Almost went with Casey Stengel, mainly for the entertainment level alone, but upon further research found out he could be a bit of a dick. So, I'm opting for this guy, 2nd in all time wins, .586 all-time winning pct, winner of 10 pennants and 3 World Series.

    Spoiler SelectShow

    Also, I found this tidbit which seems pretty enlightened considering the times. After his death, his wife found, among his personal belongings, a list of all the black players he wanted to sign over the years.

Leave a Reply