Hi everybody! I'm Dr. House! (no relation)
Normally, I will just right into my post, but since this is the first post in the series, I'll start out talking about what this series is going to be about and what I want to do with it.
The main point will be for me to introduce you some interesting "math" problems. I put math in quotes, because as a newly appointed doctor of mathematics, my ideas about what constitutes a math problem differs greatly from someone in the general population (more on this in a bit). Normally, I'll break these posts into 3 parts:
- A recap of results/ideas from the preview volume;
- A short essay about a topic of my choosing; and
- One, two, or more interesting problems for you all to work on!
Since there is no previous volume to recap today, I'm going to lay the ground rules about what it expected from those that participate. First off, the purpose of these things is for enjoyment. I'm not going to be keeping track of how many problems you get right, so if you want to cheat and search the internet, I'm not going to try and stop you, but please be respectful and don't immediately post solutions right below the text for everyone to see. That being said, I don't want to discourage discussion either! The point is to have fun and discussing interesting problems is fun!
In order to make sure we can have open discussions about the problems, without depriving the opportunity for others to work on the problem without seeing the solution, you should make use of the new spoiler button! Because the text inside the spoiler may still show up in the comments, you should put some dummy text at the top of your post. It doesn't have to be much...probably 140 characters or so will do the trick. So for instance, suppose the question is "What is 5 times 4?". The following text:
Alison Brie
Yep, this happened. RT @laurenb1822: Just saw Super 8 with my sis! Movie, awesome. Ali crying through the whole movie, not so much...[spoiler]The answer is posted below.[/spoiler]
Spoiler 2:
[spoiler title="Spoiler with title"]The answer is 20.[/spoiler]
should produce the post:
Alison Brie
Yep, this happened. RT @laurenb1822: Just saw Super 8 with my sis! Movie, awesome. Ali crying through the whole movie, not so much...Spoiler 2:
You can also just use the spoiler button in the comment form the same way you would use bold or italic, for instance.
One last note about what does and does not belong inside a spoiler tag. Basically, anything related to a solution (even and incomplete solution) belongs inside a spoiler tag. Anything else--questions about the meaning of a question, comments about the essay, or general chit-chat don't need to go inside a spoiler tag. For instance:
Things that belong inside a spoiler tag:
- "The answer is 20."
- "To try and figure out the problem, imagine 4 rows of 5 objects...or 5 rows of 4 objects!"
Things that don't need to go inside a spoiler tag:
- "I have no idea how to do #2, but I've got some thoughts on #1."
- "That essay that Dr. House wrote was truly mind blowing. I will never look at math the same way again!"
- "That GreekHouse guy sure has a huge ego, doesn't he?"
- "I'm confused about the problem, what does 'times' mean?"
It shouldn't be hard to figure out what goes in a spoiler tag and what doesn't. Just think about it from the perspective of somebody who just read the problem for the first time and ask yourself if that aids them in a solution in any way. As is always the case on this site, be considerate of others and err on the side of caution.
And now onto the fun part!
What is Math?
I know math tends to get somewhat of a bad reputation by the population in general. Most people think back to something they did in high school that they didn't like and weren't very good at. Obviously I have a very different opinion of math and I actually think most people that claim to hate math usually mean one of two things:
- I'm not good at math
- I don't like arithmetic or algebra
It's always funny to me that someone can claim to hate math, but they enjoy card games, Sudoku, or crossword puzzles, all which are very similar to what I consider math. I also find it funny that when I teach, some students will ask "When am I going to use this in real life?" So then I give them word problems (i.e. applications of math) they complain that they don't want to do them because they're too hard. The problem isn't necessarily that the problems they're working on are necessarily bad, it's that they've already made up their minds that they don't want to do math before they've started.
Part of the problem lies within our educational system. The mathematics students do in high school is basically just a pyramid that leads up to calculus. Now, that's just fine for people who want to go to college and become engineers, but for most people, they're learning a bunch of math that is really not all that useful to them. On the other hand, there are topics such as combinatorics, probability and logic which not only might be applicable to many people who don't intend to take calculus, but they are much more interesting topics that get completely dismissed by our educational system.
There is a growing community of mathematicians who is unhappy with the way our educational system deals with teaching math. It often sucks the joy out of what should actually be a very fun and rewarding subject. Another person who agrees with is Ms. Vi Hart (who I actually got to meet briefly in New Orleans last January). She does some fantastic videos. Below is one of my favorites entitled "Snakes and Graphs".
httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=heKK95DAKms
Math is simply the process of using logic and reasoning to solve problems. This is what I love about math--almost anything can be considered a math problem. Even if you think you hate math, you actually don't. Of course, I probably don't need to convince you too much, you're already here because you love statistics. Now, I will teach you how to love other kinds of math too.
In honor of today's topic, I've decided to give you math problems that don't involve numbers of any kind.
1. Alice has an expensive gift she wants to send to Bob (Spoiler: It's a crown make of gold, jewels and Joe Mauer's sideburns). Unfortunately, she doesn't have any way to get it to him other than sending it through the mail. If she attempts to send it, she assumes it will be stolen unless it's in a box that's padlocked. Assuming both Alice and Bob both have padlocks available to them, how can Alice get the gift to Bob without having it stolen?
Note that Alice could simply put the gift in a box, padlock it, and send it to Bob. However, this doesn't really do the trick since Bob will be left with a padlocked box and no way to open it. To solve the problem, you need to be a little bit more clever!
2. This one isn't so much a problem that has a solution you should post here, it's more of a diversion for you to try and work out on your own. If you're anything like me, you loved playing peg solitaire when you were a kid. Now, we're going to play a variant of that where we are on an infinite board with a horizontal line dividing the board in half. Before you start jumping pegs, you are allowed to place as many pegs as you want in any configuration below the line. You're goal is to try and get a peg as far above the line as possible.
To get a single peg to the first row is pretty simple, and getting to the second row isn't much harder.
Getting to the third row is when things start to get more tricky, but it's still possible. It may seem that with enough pegs, you should be able to get arbitrarily far above the line, but this is not true! There is a limit to far you can get and the proof is amazing! I'm not quite willing to share it with you yet, though. You'll have to wait until next time! For now, try to see how far you can actually get. 🙂
I have a clarifying question on #1, but I'm not sure if it reveals too much about my thought process so I've spoiler'd it just to be on the safe side.
I don't think that's revealing too much. You should assume that anything inside the box can be stolen if not locked up. The box itself is safe, any padlocks attached to it are safe, and anything inside a padlocked box are safe.
I can see what your idea was! It's a good idea, but not exactly what I'm looking for. 🙂
Some may have already noticed this, but I made this change early yesterday. I considered completely redacting the text but opted instead for using "SPOILER" to indicate it was used.
Nice.
I'm off to go teach some math! I'll be back later this afternoon.
Of course, I probably don't need to convince you too much, you're already here because you love statistics.
You, and most others here, registered before I implemented it, but now anyone registering has to solve a simple math problem. I figured it might help bias the site to consist of math people.
That's one way of making sure Gardy never becomes a WGOMer.
Or Jack Morris.
Like a Canadian sweepstakes!
That might be the coolest thing I've ever heard of. Good job!
can you let us know what it is?
There's a reason why I implemented it after I registered.
Explain Hilbert's 24th problem in 140 characters or less?
Alice is an awfully un-trusting lass.
This is my answer. Pretty sure I've got it here.
Okay, or this:
Spooky, you are doing a great job thinking outside of the box! (Literally in this case)
Still, the point is not to try and circumvent the rules. These are padlocks, not combination locks. Alice can only open her own locks and Bob can only open his locks. If Alice somehow got Bob the key to one of her padlocks, then Bob could certainly use it, but she'd have to get it to him somehow without it getting stolen. Of course, if she could get Bob something important without it getting stolen, then you would have already solved the problem. 😉
Right, that's what I was trying to get at in my first post.
I think I have it, too. Also, Wikipedia is truly awesome. If you doubt it, check out my answer and take the link. It's like it reads your mind!
Are we to assume that these padlocks involve keys, or no?
Ooh, combination locks! Greekhouse said no numbers, though 😉
At least it isn't fractions.
I love fractions. Nerd alert!!1/3!!1/4!!
Oh good lord, this is going to get messy: My only assumption is that Alice's locks all use the same keys.
I was working on something like that until I considered my second solution above involving combination locks. This answer is way more fun, if much less efficient on the part of Alice and Bob.
That's why it's a logic problem, I guess. Convoluted and inefficient!
My wife looks at me like I'm an idiot when I laugh at something as hard as I just did at that.
I'll be here
Ah, that is the think I didn't consider. I knew it was going to be like a river crossing problem, I just couldn't set it up correctly.
Yeah, that's the problem that came to mind for me as well. Now I just have to wait for the good doctor to give me the yea or nay on my assumption about the locks being keyed alike. I guess it could go like this instead so it wouldn't matter-
Just to clarify, I don't hate math -- I love math -- I just prefer other people doing the math for me. Thus, I'm a programmer and not so much an analyst. That said, to my mind digital logic and algorithmic thinking are an entirely different thing from "math".
I took an elective logic course in college- loved it. I also was forced to take physics and calculus for my major (Biology- why do I need calc for Biology?)- and struggled mightily with both. I just don't find math "fun" once I go past trig.
Yeah, the calc requirement for ComSci was excessive, I thought. Not that some isn't important, but I found it's pretty cool how the brain is able to block out painful memories.
Digital logic was a blast, although when Mrs. Runner asks me if I want corn on the cob or green bean almondine as a side dish, she doesn't want to hear me answer, "yes."
The stuff on infinite series is actually quite important for a number of CS requirements. Still, something like a discrete mathematics course is more important.
Something more concrete would be useful to many.
Yeah, I think a course more tailored to the degree would be helpful, much like mathematics for
dummiesbusiness majors with precision down to only two decimals.Grew up on this. Good stuff.
Discrete Math by Sartaj Sahni. UMD teacher was Luker.
Mmmm... I loved calculus.
Well why don't you marry it! /P.W. Herman
Assume that everything that's not locked up (other than the box itself) will be stolen. The pertains to locks, keys, valuables and anything else Alice or Bob might decide to put in the box. Padlocks themselves cannot be stolen once they're locked to the box, but will be stolen if they're in an unlocked box.
building on the prior work:
That's my thought, as well, though with additional text because I can't type concisely.
ah, I missed yours, Rob. and you probably did yours without the hints from prior competitors!
(truth be told, I was slowly working my way toward the solution, but probably would have had a more laborious one first without reading sean's)
no biggie. As nice as these spoiler tags are, it really makes keeping track of everyone's posts a bit more of a task.
Row Three:
Row Four:
In regard to figuring out how far up you can go, there's only one proof I've ever seen, and it's extremely clever. The guy who proved it is very famous, so don't feel bad if you can't get it and definitely don't lose sleep over it. 🙂
That's quite the vid, Greek. I might have to look up a few more of those.
Yeah, she's quite the talker. I got to see her give a talk on making hyperbolic planes with balloons while I was in New Orleans, too. I think that vid is also up on here site somewhere.
I haven't read anyone else's work, so forgive me if these have already been presented:
I'm unsatisfied with either of these solutions. I wanted something more elegant.
I got yer elegance right here:
But a thief could do the same thing!
I just wandered in here looking for "tweets by Alison Brie". Am I in the right place?
I have no idea who she is, but I have to question her career strategy, given her role in this gem.
Given that she's a regular in Community and a recurring character in Mad Men, it would seem she's recovered.
Still...wow.
This one looks worse.
A guy in a horror film, playing a Devil-type character, named "Kane Hodder?" I'm dubious.
Wow, I had no idea how bad some of her stuff had been prior to her TV acting. I'll give her a pass though, cause you know, she's Alison Brie.
The beauty of IMDb is that most actors come from hilariously humble beginnings, and now we get to know about them.
Just think, once you get famous we'll get to look back and laugh at all the filthy porn movies you were in!
When I go on talk shows, I'll have to say "Please don't ask me about my first 346 films."
And counting!
You just took the backdoor to success!