Today ends a run where I feel like I've been at work nonstop for as long as I can remember. I'm aching to see my kids. I can't even remember how I dealt with being away from them for a month at a time.
101 thoughts on “February 20, 2012: Timing”
Comments are closed.
Mike Cameron is retiring. He was never a superstar, but he was a good player for a long time. Too often, we don't appreciate players like that.
As is Tim Wakefield. Ditto.
I saw this on twitter yesterday
There's a third possibility that he's not considering...
Puckett never played in New York? I'm sure he's considering that.
I dunno, I would probably call Mike Cameron underrated. Puckett also had his career cut short. The point Heyman is trying to make fails on multiple levels.
Yeah, the length of careers here needs to be considered, but Heyman will never be able to get that. He always writes under the assumption that every player has the exact same amount of opportunity.
forbidden zone!
Actually, it isn't that lop-sided. Mike Cameron had 7884 PAs, compared to Puckett's 7831 PAs. Of course, Cameron had five additional seasons, but they were all part-time. Puckett played a full season every year with the exception of his first, where he still played in 128 games. If anything, rWAR nailed it.
Once again, statistics ruin my childhood.
Why was Cameron part-time? Teams undervaluing him, problems with splits, or injuries? Certainly there is value to knowing your star player is going out there nearly every day for the season.
Looks like the first two years because he was young, and not that good. Seattle played him full-time. His first part-time year was 2005, and that was because of the collision with Beltran. Played full-time with the Padres and Brewers (ignoring the suspension), and then part-time with the Red Sox in 2010. That appears to be because of a groin injury. Again in 2011 he was part-time, but this time I'm guessing because he wasn't very good anymore. So, I'm going to go with 1. young and 2. injured as the reasons he played part-time.
Not to start something then leave*, but I finished "Deadwood" over the weekend. I really enjoyed the series, but it felt a little unfinished, which I take to be because HBO did not renew the series. We are seriously considering the next dog's name to be "Swidgen".
*Which is exactly what I'm gonna do, since I don't have internet at the flat yet.
Did you ever see this picture?
Ack! Evil Sheenie!
Careful, she might feed you to the pigs.
That one was a heartbreaker. The show did decent numbers and was only cancelled because of the overwhelming expense of shooting it; at least that's what I read at the time.
big changes in the minnesota twins blogosphere.
dang. TwinsGeek, Nick Nelson, and Seth Stohs all shutting down their sites. I'm a fan, since I felt all three had pretty blah sites as far as presentation went. I stopped reading all of them on a regular basis, but with a central location I may check some of that stuff out
parker too. i think that rounds off all the big ones, except for gleeman (which makes sense).
I see what you did there.
oops, what did i do?
ahh, highly unintentional. in fact, if the fat-o-meter is correct, there's a lot less gleeman than there used to be.
You could work for the 4ltr /ikidikid
it's
meat curtains for youcurtains for you, meat.I prefer skirt steak.
All good things, you guys, all good things.
Of them, I'll be saddest that Seth's site is coming down. It was such a joyfully amateurish site for the official Twins beat reporter of blogs. It was clear he had been doing it forever, and I loved his huge tables of football picks and his exuberant writing (More Sid than Shecky).
I'll admit I visited a lot less once I started using Twitter and FB: the news is sent to those places in a real-time stream. And I unfollowed Seth's on twitter two days after I followed because his RTs etc made up half my feed.
Other than getting my one article on Carlos Silva published there in exchange for a Guarddog watch, my favorite thing from him was his interview with Ben Revere seemingly hours after the draft (and well before the Strib and PiPress published any quotes from him). I think Revere even commented a bit on the article, too (or maybe that was on Gleeman's write-up). I immediately went from "What did the Twins see that no one else did?" to "Damn, I hope the Twins are right, I want him to be an All-Star."
Finally, I thought that his last name was Strohs until sometime last summer.
Um AMR, I was the person who interviewed Revere a day after the draft. Still, I agree that Seth's enthusiasm is definitely enjoyable even if I don't necessarily but into it as often.
Well, My favorite memory of Seth's site is how he linked to DPWY's interview of Ben Revere seemingly hours after the draft (and well before the Strib and PiPress published any quotes from him). I think Revere even commented a bit on the article, too (or maybe that was on Gleeman's write-up). I immediately went from "What did the Twins see that no one else did?" to "Damn, I hope the Twins are right, I want him to be an All-Star."
Good job on that, DP!
Heh thanks. I took the crazy step of looking him up on the Book of Faces and setting up the email exchange that way. Revere was ridiculously excited and I think I edited at least 75% of the exclamation points he used out of the "interview."
I created a profile over there (wouldn't want another Twins-loving Dread Pirate to create any confusion). No idea how often, if at all, I'll be posting there.
When the first comment I see was one posted by Fanatic Jack, I'd have to say my initial impression is that I'll probably only be reading the articles.
Yup, that was my initial reaction as well. I don't really need to read a whole bunch of commentors telling me that we're too easy on Joe.
But, but, AVG, HRs, RBIs!
Clearly bilateral leg weakness will keep his HRs & RBIs down. What a bum. We should've signed Cliff Lee instead!!!1
.
Cliff Lee 2011, 2 HR, 7 RBI
Joe Mauer 2011, 3 HR, 30 RBI
Joe wins!
Good Point. I'm now AMR there.
Also signed up and borrowed CoC's description of the WGOM to use in my signature just in case I ever post something.
CoC's description of the WGOM
I should know this, but I don't off the top of my head. Refresher?
Here is it:
I edited it a bit for length.
danke.
I'll add that to mine as well. Now that the Centric Powers are in concert on one site, there's no reason we can't have a little détente between nations.
That makes it Twinkie Town, Gleeman, Twins Daily, and then us. Probably in that order for views as well.
But we have bS, which means our comments are way ahead of the rest...
And he's only #2 here.
Heh. But I try harder.
TAKE IT BACK
If we're going by comments, CdL might be in the lead because of DG.
What's that supposed to mean
?
The CdL/DG only today topped 25k. We've got 40k on them still.
I wonder if they have a "rob" yet?
Edit: They didn't, but now they do.
way to get in on the ground floor.
Alright, I got cheaptoy before anyone else could.
So if we all register, can we try to turn it into an alternate WGOM in case we suddenly can't raise any money for this place?
Their system won't allow two-character usernames, so my registering appears unlikely.
tragic.
I see someone already registered Saul Goodman over there. That's pretty fantastic.
Perhaps I should register as Tyrion Lannister.
I thought about registering there, but I don't know what I'd do there that I don't already do (or couldn't do) here.
Even if it's just to make one well-argued and respectful comment in a sea of noise, just register your name so there isn't a different JeffA.
If you are looking to increase eyeballs here, I would suggest posting stuff over there linking to here.
They explicitly said they are cool with that:
the Wolves play Denver tonight. The bad news is that at 16-16, the Wolves are still last in the Northwest Division. In fact, it's game 33, and it will be the Wolves 3 game against a Divisional foe. They are 0-2 on the season, losing game 1 against OKC, and game 16 against Utah.
The good news is that we have a ton of games against the NW and have a chance to leapfrog over a bunch of teams in little time.
Yeah, but the Wolves are just one game out of second!
Anyone follow Corey Koskie on Twitter? (It sure seems a legit feed, although not verified.)
Presented here in chronological order, because they're all through twitlonger:
#sackup... classy.
It sure seems a legit feed, although not verified.
judging by some of the accounts that are following him (like the official twins feed and other FO members), i'd say it's legit.
Always loved Koskie. Even more now.
I guess I'm just going to have to @learn how #toread Twitter.
Yeah, c'mon. Sack up.
Seriously, I had a hard time with that, and I do read the occasional twitterpation.
I struggled at first, but half way through I started to parse it out. The first part of each message, up to the @ symbols is Koskie while everything after that is what he is responding to.
Ah, now it makes much more sense.
RT = "retweet". After that, Koskie is quoting the author.
I feel old every time someone mentions twitter. #wtfisahashtag
OK, here's a cleaned-up translation:
I'm imagining Shecky as a chair in the Baltimore dugout.
It was Cleveland
You're now my official translator for Twitter, AMR. Trust me, I need one.
Seconded. That was super-helpful.
Just use this as a Rosetta Stone.
It's easier in Twitter itself because the @'s, which are other users, are shown in blue, so it breaks it up.
At one point, I tried to use brackets for corrections like
But I really don't know how to do that for such extensively-needed corrections.
Win percentages for players in games they started. Six of the Twins players are actually from the Senators, one is from the earliest Twins years, leaving just three from post-1970. Guess which of those post-1970 players ranks the highest in win percentage.
It would have taken me 300 guesses to get there.
Position players?
In that case, I'll guess: Luis Rivas, Nick Punto, and Joe Mauer.
Rivas correct. Mauer correct.
Wouldn't have guessed the third. I thought his career started earlier than it did.
Clearly, Rivas was a player who knew how to win.
This dovetails nicely with the "Mike Cameron, All Star" discussion above:
Of course, that's in reply to sean's thread...
Well this is just strange.
Here comes the judge.
If the Lakers are stupid enough to make this deal, fine. But, I don't like it from the Wolves' end, either.
what I dont understand about the Gasol trade is where will he play? Pek has established himself as a starting C, and Love is a dominate PF....so put Gasol at the 3? move Love there? Gasol as a $21 mil backup?
Right, we already have a teddy bear.
Yeah, this is what I don't like about it. We already have those positions covered.
If we are convinced that Pek! is the real deal, then a trade of Williams for Gasol makes very little sense, particularly given the salary disparities.
Now, if LA were willing to eat some contracts (Darko, SCB/Wes, and Miller) to make the deal balance, rather than taking Williams, we could talk. But it still doesn't make much sense. Minnesota needs a two and a three, not another starting 4/5 earning ~max money.
Too bad Sacramento isn't holding a fire sale. Marcus Thornton could be a tasty addition, assuming his shooting pct comes back around to career averages (he missed a week or so with a bad thigh bruise; that will affect a jump shooter).
But really, the Wolves' best bet probably is to sit back and wait for Williams to develop at the 3.
So, I'm not sure if y'all watch the news, but my dad was on it tonight. In little Blue Earth, Minnesota, a guy was murdered in an invasion on his home last night. Next door to my dad.
that whole story is weird. I hope they catch the person who did it
Movie Day will be tomorrow, everyone. I have the day off, so that'll be better for me anyway. Sorry if it's worse for everyone else. Ahem.
Gave me the chance to watch two more episodes of Downton Abbey...