54 thoughts on “2014 Day Game 112: Padres at Twins”

  1. Huh, wasn't seeing it on the front page. Oh well. More importantly- Jeff Francoeur is a Padre?

      1. I'd just logged onto MLB.com and got excited about the free game and really wanted to share the good news. That lasted about thirty seconds.

  2. bunting is fun !!11!!one

    also, that play should be reviewed because he was still in the box

    1. My hope is to have game log stadium posts filled by photos citizens have actually taken. This might be the first with a photo from the actual game.

  3. Another shaky start to an inning for Perkins. I hope he can come back and hold them scoreless the way he has other innings lately.

    1. I don't know about "bad," but it sure wasn't good Perkins. Hate to see him give up runs to the 7-8-9 batters.
      Fortunately, the Twins have the 3-4-5 hitters up.

  4. Yes, let's bunt on the pitcher that a) has sort of strugged lately and b) can't throw strikes.

    1. Just wanted to set up the [edit] rookie [edit] Arcia [edit]CCPP Escobar heroics.

  5. Well, we'll see if Schafer can get the bunt down, because he sure shouldn't be swinging away here.

      1. Well, I don't know. He's probably a better batter than several of the Twins' pitchers.

      2. No kidding. Tough part is, he did his job as a PR for Plouffe, so I can't really complain about the usage.

    1. Closers are bound to have a blown save here and there. It's when coupled with a team going 3-16 with RISP that things get really sideways.

      1. True. But this is the fifth time in his last seven games that Perkins has given up two hits in an inning. Over that span, the opposition is 12-for-29 (.414) against him. He'd just managed to wriggle out of it before today. I understand it's a small sample size, but closers are always going to have small sample sizes, and this isn't a good trend.

        1. He only gave up one hit. That was an improvement. The timing was bad. Actually, the pitch selection was horrible. Alonso has been killing fastballs all series and they gave him another one on the first pitch.

      2. I hate the way the media is so focused on stupid stuff like this. It might be frustrating to fans when a team leaves RISP, but it just means they are getting RISP. The Twins walked 7 times and got 2 HBP, so of course they left a lot of runners. It's very hard for walks to bring in runners. Getting lots of chances is good. The Twins' problem isn't that they don't hit with RISP, it's that they don't hit very well period and they don't hit for much power either. And how is focusing on not hitting with RISP going to help? All it does is make batters grip their bats tighter in those situations and just makes it worse.

        Thanks for allowing me to rant. This is no reflection on you.

        1. I hear ya. I heard the same thing in the post-game show, and they always make it seem like if the batters were just clutchier, the Twins would be on their way to the World Series.

      3. Also, if Escobar doesn't get robbed by spectacular defensive play, the Twins would have been 4-for-14 w/RISP, which is better than their batting average overall on the season (.248 coming into the game).

  6. Why does no one seem to care that Fien wasn't used? Why was our worst RH reliever put in to face the Padres' best LH power hitter in a tie game? Why was probably our worst RH batter allowed to make the final out with Willingham, one of our best hitters, on the bench? And if batting average is cited, I'm going to punch someone.

    1. My guess would be that, having used Burton for two innings, Gardy wanted to save Fien for tonight if he could. I do agree on Willingham, although the fact that, with his numbers, he is still "one of our best hitters" says a lot about the Twins hitters.

Comments are closed.