Game 100: Brooklyn Dodgers at Los Angeles Senators

Los Angeles Senators

Celebrating 70 Years of Baseball in the City of Angels

All credit to "Tom" over at Ghosts of DC.

Griffith declared he has assurances from Los Angeles officials that a written proposal for transfer of the Washington franchise would be forthcoming before the Nats 5-man board of directors meets on Friday.
“I am sure we will have a Los Angeles offer to consider in addition to those received from San Francisco and Louisville,” Griffith said. “That is the word I received by telephone from Kenneth Hahn, Los Angeles county supervisor.”

Included in the Los Angeles proposal, Griffith said, would be guarantees of a stadium seating “at least 50,000, perhaps larger, with parking for 20,000 cars, and low stadium rental.”

The Louisville proposal offering use of the new Fairgrounds Stadium seating nearly 32,000, which could be expanded to 40,000, was made, Griffith said, by William Henry, Fairgrounds superintendent. It was accompanied by a letter from Kentucky Governor A. B. (Happy) Chandler.
The mayor of San Francisco authorized that city’s bid for the Washington franchise, Griffith said. It emphasized the availability of a $5 million bond issue, already passed, into which to build a stadium for the stipulated purpose of inviting major league baseball.

The negotiations and bidding war was heating up (by the way, Happy Chandler was also the former commissioner of Major League Baseball and a U.S. Senator). On Wednesday, October 17th, the Post reported the official offer received by the team.

Los Angeles officials yesterday telegraphed Calvin Griffith an offer of a new $11,000,000 stadium and appropriated $2,000,000 with which to buy out their minor league franchise in a new move to lure his Washington team to that city.

Griffith said he was disappointed at the County Board’s failure to spell out its proposal in complete detail for submission to the Friday meeting of the Washington Club’s board of directors.
“I’m not going out there to work out any plans,” said Griffith, president of the Washington club. “They are the ones seeking a franchise. We’re not.”

Griffith was non-commital on the question as to whether construction of a new, municipal stadium in Washington would be sufficient to keep the Nats in the Capital. “We’ll answer that question and a lot of others on Friday.”

The good news, albeit temporary, was that Griffith didn’t like the deal offered by Los Angeles. He ended up passing that year and the Senators would stay in Washington for the 1957 season.

After the 1957 season, L.A. successfully lured the Dodgers from Brooklyn with San Francisco pulling in their rival Giants. The Senators lost their negotiating position slightly and rebuffed an attempt by Minneapolis to bring them to town for the 1958 season.

Major League Baseball expanded after the 1960 season by adding a new franchise in Minneapolis. Still stuck in D.C. with an old stadium and lagging attendance, Calvin requested that his team swap with the new expansion team. The Senators would become the Minnesota Twins and Washington would get a new, even crappier Senators team, complete with a roster of unrecognizable players. The Twins would go on to face the Los Angeles Dodgers in the 1965 World Series.

Maybe alternate history helps the current iteration of the club salvage a win & avoid a sweep. We'll see what Erv has for them tonight.

"With Clayton Kershaw on the disabled list with a lower back strain, manager Dave Roberts will insert righty Brock Stewart into the Dodgers' starting rotation."

"Stewart, ranked by MLBPipeline.com as the Dodgers' No. 10 prospect, will make his first start this season on Wednesday against the Twins..."

Source

52 thoughts on “Game 100: Brooklyn Dodgers at Los Angeles Senators”

  1. There's an alternate universe out there where Harmon Killebrew is wearing an LA cap on his plaque in the Hall of Fame, and where Willie Mays' cap sports the M he originally wore with the Minneapolis Millers.

    1. I missed this comment last night - glad someone appreciated my open. I was all excited that some of our historians and D.C. expats would appreciate the exercise. Also, Ghosts of DC is a pretty cool site.

      1. I have to confess that I originally missed your open. But CH's comment here sent me back up and I was glad it did. Thanks for the work on this one - it was very much appreciated.

        1. Thanks, though again, most of the work credit rightfully goes to the article's author and blog creator.

  2. Instead watched Pink Floyd - Beyond the Wall. Good to see the Twins didn't hit the wall in the meantime.

    How does Erv score two runs in two AB when one of them was a sacrifice bunt?

  3. Oh, please forget about the "back in my day, we played the game and never showed any emotion" discussion by the time the commercial break ends.

  4. Its amazing how many people they could jam into the Colosseum to watch a baseball game.

  5. 50,931 attendance. On a Wednesday. Against the Twins. Might have something to do with Kershaw Bobblehead Night, but still.

  6. What you fellas said.
    Good lord.
    Also, I don't think that slipped. I think he chucked it to first thinking he'd double off Hernandez.

  7. He had zero chance at getting the runner at first base, but contrary to what Jack and Dick are saying, it really didn't look like the ball came out of his hand all that wrong.

    I dunno.

  8. I'm feeling pretty down on Polanco lately (since early May?), but Kepler ain't exactly lighting it up at the plate either.
    [edit] bS called it

  9. Not a fan of the behind the plate for the whole pitch sequence shots. Can't see the pitcher/batter dynamic.

    1. to be fair-ish, Jansen at home this year is allowing a slash line of 101/134/215 with 31:3 K:BB in 82 batters faced before tonight.

      In other words, good effing luck.

      1. I know. Just frustrated watching the "eyes closed, swing from the heels," at a letter high 99 mph fastball approach.

  10. Neshek traded to the Rockies. Going from the worst team in baseball to a playoff contender has to soften the hardship of moving a wee bit.

Comments are closed.