CHICAGO 4, MINNESOTA 0 IN MINNESOTA
Date: Wednesday, August 21.
Batting stars: None.
Pitching stars: Ryne Harper pitched a scoreless inning, giving up a hit and a walk and striking out one. Sam Dyson pitched a perfect inning and struck out one. Tyler Duffey struck out two in a perfect inning. Trevor May pitched a scoreless inning, giving up a hit and striking out one.
Opposition stars: Lucas Giolito struck out twelve in a complete game shutout, giving up three hits and no walks. Jose Abreu was 3-for-5 with a double and two RBIs. Leury Garcia was 2-for-5 with two runs. Tim Anderson was 2-for-5.
The game: The Twins helped the White Sox get two runs in the first inning. Garcia led off with a single, and runners were on first and second when Jorge Polanco failed to touch second on what should have been a force out. Abreu then singled home a run, a wild pitch moved runners to second and third, and Matt Skole singled to make it 2-0.
In the third, singles by Garcia, Anderson, and Abreu made it 3-0. In the fifth, Abreu doubled, went to third on a ground out, and scored on a wild pitch to make it 4-0.
Meanwhile, the Twins could get nothing accomplished on offense. Polanco had a bunt single in the first, Nelson Cruz had a one-out single in the fourth, and Jonathan Schoop had a one-out double in the eighth. That was all the offense the Twins had, with Schoop the only Twin to get as far as second base.
WP: Giolito (14-6). LP: Jake Odorizzi (13-6). S: None.
Notes: Max Kepler remained in center field, with Jake Cave in right, in the continued absence of Byron Buxton. Luis Arraez was at third base, with Miguel Sano moving to first. Eddie Rosario started in left, but was removed in the fifth inning due to a tight hamstring. Rather than use an outfielder, the Twins moved Arraez to left, Sano to third, and put Ehire Adrianza in the game at first base. I'm not sure why you'd rather have Sano at third than Adrianza, but I admit that I haven't looked at their defensive stats at third base.
Arraez was 0-for-3 and is batting .341. Cruz was 1-for-4 and is batting .303. Duffey has an ERA of 2.95.
The Twins made another error and threw three more pitches to the backstop. I'm probably sounding like Johnny One-note mentioning this all the time, but I'd be happy to stop mentioning it if the Twins would stop doing it. I could easily have missed it, but I don't remember Rocco or the front office publicly addressing the defensive lapses. The only thing I've hears is the occasional comment that "No one feels worse about that than [the responsible player]", which is probably true but doesn't do anything to solve the problem. I have no idea what may be going on privately, of course, nor is there any reason I should. But whatever they may be doing privately doesn't seem to be helping, and publicly they don't seem very concerned. They should be. When you play bad teams, you can sometimes rely on your batting to overcome your defensive woes. When you play good teams, you can't afford to give them free bases and extra outs. The Twins had better get the defense tightened up pretty soon.
It's obviously disappointing to lose two of three to the lowly White Sox, and it's tempting to get really upset about it. But the thing is, that's baseball. A bad team takes a series from a good team sometimes. Giolito is a very good pitcher, and he'll shut a team down sometimes. Ivan Nova is not as good as Giolito, but he's good enough that he'll have an occasional really good game, too. And the Twins did not have a lot of luck in this series--fourteen hits with only four runs in the first game, lots of soft-contact hits for the White Sox in the last game. It happens. Yes, the Twins made some contributions to their bad luck, but it was still a factor. It happens, because it's baseball. That's why there's no such thing as an upset in any particular baseball game. As Joaquin Andujar told us, the one word that describes baseball best is youneverknow.
The good news is that Cleveland lost, too. The Twins don't have to win any specific number of games to win the division. They just have to win one more than the Indians. Right now, they've won three more. I'm not saying "All is well", but I'd still rather be three games up than three games back.
Record: The Twins are 77-50, in first place in the American League Central, three games ahead of Cleveland.
Projected record: We'll just have to settle for 112-50!
Projected record: We'll just have to settle for 112-50!
Makes one appreciate just how amazing Seattle's 116-46 season really was.
Yankees also lost. I'm still eyeing home field advantage.
On the most recent episode of Midwest Swing, Brandon Warne & Tom Schreier were discussing what they thought was the minimum acceptable won-loss for this stretch of 13 games against Chicago & Detroit. Schreier said 9-4, which Warne agreed nine wins was “where the Twins need to be.” Warne said he couldn’t imagine losing three games, but allowed that “anything can happen.”
Anything can happen like Odorrizzi deciding being an All-Star wasn't as much fun as throwing a million pitches to some shitty teams.
I wonder how much defense is able to be coached as opposed to other skills. I don't know how much Rocco could say other than, "We're addressing the defensive concerns." If a player sucks at defense, you can coach him and he'll either be better or not better. Unless you truly think the player is just dogging it or showing off. But historically errors have been seen as a mental problem versus bad hitting or bad pitching.
I guess I don't know why defense would be less coachable than batting or baserunning or pitching. Part of defense, especially in the outfield, is speed, and there's only so much you can do about that. But lack of speed doesn't really have much to do with errors. The other aspects of defense would seem just as coachable as anything else. Of course, i could never learn to do anything in baseball (other than bunt), so what do I know?
I agree. Which is why I was saying that managers seem to have their feet put more to the fire when the defense is sloppy versus when the pitching is sloppy or the batting is sloppy, as if all they have to do is have a Come to Jesus Talk and everything with the defense should turn out fine.
Okay. I misunderstood you. And I think you're right, errors do tend to be seen as a mental problem, and I think there's at least an extent to which that's correct. Botching routine plays would seem to indicate a lack of focus and concentration (unless Knoblauch Syndrome or something is involved), and it's generally considered to be part of the manager's job to keep his players focused and ready to play. Of course, with some players that's much easier said than done.
This is all assuming the manager puts his players in more or less there natural positions and doesn't move them around a whole lot.