Game 28: royals @ twins

This series marks the beginning of a very important stretch of games for the Twins. We're two games into a ten game stretch of games against our central division rivals where the only opponent with a winning record is....well, nobody. It's the Royals and the Clevelanders and the utterly terrible White Sox. Then things toughen up against the Padres and the surprisingly beatable Dodgers.

All the time, this is our time. 7 wins in these 10 games won't be enough. These are three of the four worst offense in baseball (the other, of course, is the Tigers). Allowing so much as a runner in scoring position against these teams is nearly unforgivable.

You hear that, Over? I want a perfect game today. A. PERFECT. GAME. Get it done.

40 thoughts on “Game 28: royals @ twins”

  1. I was expecting Buxton to take the field earlier than May. Now I wonder if it'll happen at all in the first half of the season.

    1. There seems to be a bit more to the story of his DH-only stint than has been reported.

      Obviously the specifics of their health situations are different, but Buxton gives me Eric Davis vibes.

  2. The difference between Morneau or Hawkins in the booth compared to Smalley is sooooo vast. Its kind of amazing how much harder this booth is to listen to.

    1. I don't see how it could be worse than having to listen to Rex Hudler on the KC broadcast.

        1. Smart move. Inane MLB blackout rules won't allow me to use my mlbtv for games against the royals. Evidently Nebraska is in the greater KC metro area.

          1. There's definitely a reason why I consider MLB tv's "stadium sounds only" to be the greatest advancement in sports broadcasting history.

  3. Just looking at the box score (I missed the game), the Twins had sixteen baserunners (ten hits, five walks, one hit batsman), and scored just two runs. One of them was on a home run, so you could say they had fifteen baserunners and scored one run. That's not easy to do.

Comments are closed.