Tag Archives: Mike Pelfrey

2013 Game 103: KC George Alexanders vs. MN Emily & Marens

While none of us have had a lot of recent experience seeing the Royals atop the Twins in the standings, there was a time when the more wrinkled and bent among us did. Back when pant-legs were still short and stirrup socks were long, when free agency and the designated hitter rule were busy destroying the game as we knew it, back before expansion and realignment and wild cards made a mockery of what winning a pennant was all about, and when lawns were gloriously free of trespassers, the Kansas City Royals were an elite ball club in the seven-team American League West, perennial contenders who made it to the more exclusive playoffs seven times between 1976 and 1985 and won the World Series in the final year of that stretch. (Suck on that sentence, Mr. Faulkner.) The Royals rosters back in those days were a litany of greats -- George Brett, Steve Balboni, Frank White, Hal McRae, Bret Saberhagen, Dan Quisenberry and Charlie Liebrandt to name a few. But then the team fell on hard times.

Continue reading 2013 Game 103: KC George Alexanders vs. MN Emily & Marens

2013 Game 47: Tigers at Twins

The Twins won yesterday! That had been a while. Of course, I didn't see a single minute of it because of circumstance, but I suppose I'm glad it happened.

It's Pelfrey vs. Scherzer today, so let's temper our expectations even more than normal.

I'd add more here, but I just woke up after a very satisfying night's sleep for once and I really don't have time. Go Twins, and all that.

Game 37: WSox at Twins

DAY GAME ALERT!

Probables:

CWS - Dylan Axelrod (0-3, 4.17)

MNT - Mike Pelfrey (3-3, 6.03)

Those are some ugly numbers for today's starting pitchers.

Lineups:

Sox:

  1. DeWayne Wise CF
  2. Alexei Ramirez SS
  3. Alex Rios RF
  4. Adam Dunn 1B
  5. Paul Konerko DH
  6. Conor Gillaspie 3B
  7. Dayan Viciedo LF
  8. Jeff Keppinger 2B
  9. Hector Gimenez C

Twins:

  1. Carroll 2B
  2. Mauer DH
  3. Willingham LF
  4. Mountie 1B
  5. Doumit C
  6. Arcia RF
  7. Hicks CF
  8. Escobar 3B
  9. Florimon SS

Go Twins!

2013 Game 27: Twins at Indians

Big Pelf faces Corey Kluber.

I don't want to overstate the healing power of baseball here, but I need this game. The last couple of days since Nayasha's death have been harsh as reality starts to set in. Baseball, though, brings me together with you folks, with my wife (who's been humoring me by watching more games lately) and with Pat Neshek, who routinely helps me board the train to the next level on Candy Crush Saga (really).

Though I'm not totally hopeless, I doubt we'll stick this close to .500 much longer, specifically with Pelfrey up there. Still, I need this game, and I'm anxious for it to start.

Go Twins. Surprise me a little.

Game 8: Turn on the Lights

Holy cats, a night game! (Maybe. If it isn't rained out, and based on the weather report, that's a very real possiblity.)

Mike Pelfrey vs. Jeremy Guthrie

My first ever game log and it comes against a Jeremy. Fortunately, it also comes in the second game of a series after an opening loss, so I expect a solid, 4-3 victory for the Twins tonight. Maybe. If it isn't rained out.

This will be the first start for Pelfrey since his Wichita State Shockers were removed from that thing that is named after March but not fully contained within March. Hopefully he's had enough time to get over the loss so he can throw some innings against the Royals.

More importantly, Hicks wasn't with the organization when the whole Jeremy curse began, so I fully expect him to hit two doubles and a home run tonight. More realistically, I don't. But, I've been hearing a load about sending him down to Rochester. I don't know his "make-up", but I don't see a problem with letting him hack his way through the whole season barring The Minnesota Curse injury. He can always gain confidence with the extra games against the Astros. Now, it'll be a different story when he strikes out in the bottom of the ninth of Game 7 of the World Series. We'll cross that bridge when we get there, though.