Category Archives: Minnesota Twins

1991 World Series: Game 4

Part One -- Game Details

                           1  2  3    4  5  6    7  8  9     R  H  E
                                 -  -  -    -  -  -    -  -  -     -  -  -
    Minnesota Twins              0  1  0    0  0  0    1  0  0     2  7  0
    Atlanta Braves               0  0  1    0  0  0    1  0  1     3  8  0

    PITCHERS: MIN - Morris, Willis (7), Guthrie (8), Bedrosian (9)
              ATL - Smoltz, Wohlers (8), Stanton (8)

               WP - Mike Stanton
	       LP - Mark Guthrie
             SAVE - none

   HOME RUNS: MIN - Pagliarulo
              ATL - Pendleton, Smith

Part Two -- Players of the Game, WPA Style

1. Mike Pagliarulo: 39.9%
2. (redacted) Lemke: 30.4%
3. Lonnie Smith: 29.1%
4. Mike Stanton: 24.2%
5. Jack Morris: 23.1%

There's a Twins third baseman again. And there's Jack Morris again. He really did have a great series.

Game Changing Moment -- Both Lonnie Smith's 7th inning homer and Lemke's 9th inning triple increased the Braves' odds of winning by 25%.

Part Three -- Ray Fosse Suffers PTSD

When I was a kid, with an undeveloped sense of reason, I thought plowing into the catcher was fun. I even did it once in Little League, and had it done once to me (out on both ends). Watching this series, I about wanted to vomit.

Dan Gladden spiking Greg Olson is immortalized in one of our banners. Gladden was out by several feet and he decided to pull a Ty Cobb. In this game, Lonnie Smith is out by at least ten feet after he couldn't score from second on a double that reached the wall (man, that guy was a terrible base runner).  He then pulls off his best Pro Wrestling move, Starman's Flying Cross Chop. Ronnie Lott probably took notes. Just disgusting. I'll be so glad if they get this rule changed. Anything to make my favorite sport less like football.

Also, I love Brian Harper. Even his temper tantrum after he didn't tag Lemke to end the game. He tries to spike the ball, but he loses the ball, so he just flails his fists like a baby.

Part Four -- Who's The Clutchiest Clutch Playoff Hero?

Throughout both the 1987 and 1991, World Series, we hear many, many times how often the "little guy" is the hero. It gets to the point where the announcers begin wondering aloud who the "little guy hero" will be today. To be fair, they did witness a lot of little heroes in these two series. Tom Lawless was perhaps the most unlikely hero ever.  Mark Lemke and Steve Lombardozzi went completely nuts. Tim Laudner and Scott Leuis far outperformed their regular season stats. Greg Gagne homered at twice the rate during the playoffs as he did during the regular season.

Of course, us here at the WGOM recognize that the playoffs are Small Sample Size Theater in action, and for every little guy that hits a game-winning single, there's a bunch of little guys that continue to hit like little guys. Lemke turned into a pumpkin for the rest of his playoff career.

What I wanted to look at today are the all-time leaders in Win Probability Added for hitters in the playoffs. When you're looking at "heroes," this stat is the best as it accounts for the big moments (both good and bad) people tend to remember. I was curious to see if the list would be populated by great players or would be a random sampling of good and bad players given the small sample size.

Thanks to sabermetrician Adam Darowski for this list he compiled in 2011. Here are the Top 41 batters all-time by playoff WPA. I wish I had a list for the last two years, as I'm sure Carlos Beltran would be high up if we included his last two years.

Blue = Lifetime OPS+ under 100

1. Babe Ruth
2. Pete Rose
3. Lou Gehrig
4. Alex Rodriguez
5. Albert Pujols
6. David Ortiz
7. Charlie Keller
8. Home Run Baker
9. Dave Henderson
10. Manny Ramirez
11. Lenny Dykstra
12. Johnny Bench
13. Kirk Gibson
14. Gary Carter
15. Mickey Mantle
16. Paul Molitor
17. Willie Aikens
18. Thurman Munson
19. Hideki Matsui
20. Edgardo Alfonso
21. George Brett
22. Jim Leyritz
23. Lance Berkman
24. Duffy Lewis
25. James Loney
26. Billy Hatcher
27. Jimmie Foxx
28. Tris Speaker
29. Reggie Jackson
30. Barry Bonds
31. J.T. Snow
32. Johnny Evers
33. Scott Spezio
34. Ken Griffey Jr.
35. Ruben Sierra
36. Duke Snider
37. Kirby Puckett
38. Jayson Werth
39. Otis Nixon
40. Francisco Cabrera
41. Hank Aaron

Out of the Top 41, there's just three guys who weren't at least average hitters.

Billy Hatcher: LIfetime OPS+ of 86. In 61 plate appearances he went 404/466/654. His biggest hit was a solo homer in the bottom of the 14th inning against the Mets in game 6 of the 1986 NLCS. The Astros went on to lose in the bottom of the 16th. Hatcher got an RBI in the 16th as well.  In the 1990 WS, Jose Rijo was given the MVP. It was deserved, but Hatcher certainly was the runner-up.

Scott Spiezio: Lifetime OPS+ of 95. In 95 plate appearances he went 284/379/531. His biggest momemnt, WPA wise, was a go-ahead RBI against the Yankees in the 2002 ALDS. He also had other big hits, including a homer against the Twins in the ALCS in Game 5, though Twins fans probably remember Adam Kennedy's awfulness primarily.

Otis Nixon: Lifetime OPS+ of 77. In 93 plate apperances he went 321/396/383. He ended the 1992 World Series trying to bunt home the game-tying run, so I'm surprised he made the list. But I forgot that in the bottom of the 9th of the same game, he got the game-tying hit with two outs to send the game into extras.

I suppose the end results shouldn't be that surprising. The list is populated by some of the best hitters of all-time. Guys who hit well during the regular season tend to hit well in the playoffs. For sure there's been a lot of memorable hits by little guys, but we tend to forget all the times those little guys fail because we expect them to. Meanwhile, the big guys tend to get blamed when they do poorly despite the fact that the big guys are often responsible for the biggest playoff moments.

1991 World Series: Game 3

Part 1 -- Game Details

                              1  2  3    4  5  6    7  8  9   10 11 12     R  H  E
                                 -  -  -    -  -  -    -  -  -    -  -  -     -  -  -
    Minnesota Twins              1  0  0    0  0  0    1  2  0    0  0  0     4 10  1
    Atlanta Braves               0  1  0    1  2  0    0  0  0    0  0  1     5  8  2

    PITCHERS: MIN - Erickson, West (5), Leach (5), Bedrosian (6), Willis (8), Guthrie (10), Aguilera (12)
              ATL - Avery, Pena (8), Stanton (10), Wohlers (12), Mercker (12), Clancy (12)

               WP - Jim Clancy
	       LP - Rick Aguilera
             SAVE - none

   HOME RUNS: MIN - Davis, Puckett
              ATL - Justice, Smith

Part 2 -- Players of the Game, WPA Style

Mark Lemke: 33.5 %
Chili Davis: 30.3 %
Mike Stanton: 26.9%
Mark Guthrie: 26.9 %
Carl Willis: 23.9%

Game Changing Moment--Mark Lemke's game-winning single, increasing the Braves' odds of winning by 39%.

Part 3 -- Kelly Goes All Tony LaRussa

This game is famous for many reasons, one of which is the Twins using 23 players in one game and Aguilera having to bat in the 12th innings. But this could have been avoided if Kelly wasn't running the roster like it was game seven. How many mistakes did Kelly make? Let's count the ways.

1.  Calling in David West to replace Scott Erickson.

On one hand, West would be your long man, given that he was the only other starter on the team. But by using your only long man this early, you can pretty well guarantee you'll be screwed if you go to extra innings. Kelly said he eventually would have taken Aguilera out after three innings and put in Dan Gladden to pitch. Thankfully, he was saved this embarrassment.

2. Using Terry Leach For Just One Batter

By pulling Leach for Gene Larkin, Kelly left himself with four pitchers. Granted, he was able to milk a lot out of them, but he didn't need to. Kelly had the double-switch at his disposal. He could have removed Greg Gagne (who had ended the 5th inning) for Pagliarulo, moving Leius to short. Then, if Pags needs to be lifted against a lefty (which is what happened later anyway) you have Newman.

3. Replacing Chili Davis with Jarvis Brown

Now I get that Davis's range in right field was probably nil and he hadn't played there all year. And the game was tied. But it's not like Brown was Jesse Barfield. And it's not like Randy Bush was Delmon Young out there either. You leave Davis in, you have a huge bat in the lineup in the 9th when Harper is on 2nd base. Bush pinch-hit (and he was good against righties that year), which was fine, but then that left the Twins without an emergency fielder in Brown. Incidentally, Jarvis Brown didn't have one ball hit to him while he was in there.

Part 4 -- The Designated Hitter is Awesome

I would never argue that game three wasn't a blast. Rick Aguilera was almost as good a hitter as Al Newman, and he came pretty close to being the game's hero when he lined a Jim Clancy pitch to deep center field. But from a purely logical standpoint, it should never have to happen.

After Game 3, a lot of people were interviewed about the DH. Fay Vincent, who was adamantly against it, said the proof that the DH was bad was Game 3, because not having it made the game more interesting. Tommy Lasorda insisted that his job was tougher than Tom Kelly's because he had to deal with situations like in game 3, and that Kelly could manage from home because once he made the lineups, his decisions were over.

I don't like swearing at the WGOM, but I don't want to mention every other ignorant thing he said during the World Series broadcast, so give me just this one: Fuck Tommy Lasorda.

Perhaps worse, McCarver tacitly agreed with the above thoughts. He did point out that Kelly has to make pitching changes, but he also was on 87 broadcast, when it was mentioned that Kelly likes to be in control of every decision in the game. Kelly calls for bunts, calls for steals, calls for take signs.  He uses a stopwatch to time the pitcher and catcher.  All of it.

I sometimes enjoy the novelty of pitchers hitting. But as Tom Kelly says, the fans don't come to the ballpark to watch him manage or watch pitchers flail helplessly. They come to see hitters hit.

Part 5 -- Justice Was Out

Justice

I think.

 

1991 World Series: Game 2

Part 1 -- Game Details

                               1  2  3    4  5  6    7  8  9     R  H  E
                                 -  -  -    -  -  -    -  -  -     -  -  -
    Atlanta Braves               0  1  0    0  1  0    0  0  0     2  8  1
    Minnesota Twins              2  0  0    0  0  0    0  1  x     3  4  1

    PITCHERS: ATL - Glavine
              MIN - Tapani, Aguilera (9)

               WP - Kevin Tapani
	       LP - Tom Glavine
             SAVE - Rick Aguilera

   HOME RUNS: ATL - none
              MIN - Davis, Leius

Part 2 -- Stars of the Game, WPA Style

Kevin Tapani: 33.5 %
Scott Leius: 16.8 %
Rick Aguilera: 16.7 %
Chili Davis: 11.1 %
Terry Pendleton: 10.1 %

Tapani was great like he was all year. And Scott Leius took part in what was an amazing playoffs (WPA wise) for the Twins third basemen.

Part 3 -- The Best First Baseman Tom Kelly's Ever Seen

That's an actual paraphrased quote about Kent Hrbek, at least according to the World Series broadcasters. Hilariously, they mention that Kelly said this about Hrbek mere seconds before he pulled Gant off first base. Hrbek must be the best ever if he could get away with that play.

Let's quickly get that play out of the way. I've seen the replay a zillion times. Hrbek pulled on Gant's leg. Would Gant's momentum have taken him off regardless? I put the chance of that at ten percent.  What's more hilarious, however, is that the booth decided to patch in the director of major league umpires to get his opinion on Drew Coble's call. He defended the call. Shocking, I know.

Getting back to Hrbek's defense. Not only do Buck and McCarver quote Kelly as saying Hrbek's the best fielding first baseman he ever saw, they trumpet his fielding several times throughout the series, even going so far as to call him the best in the league at that time. So why don't we look at the fielding metrics for 1991.

Total Zone Runs as 1B

1. Quintana  (8)
2. Mattingly (6)
3. Olerud (6)
4. Stubbs (3)
5. Benzinger (3)

Range Factor/9 Innings

1. Joyner (10.42)
2. Stubbs (10.33)
3. Hrbek (10.25)
4. Milligan (10.08)
5. Fielder (9.88)

Fielding Percentage

1. O'Brien (.997)
2. Clark (.997)
3. McGwire (.997)
4. Olerud (.996)
5. Mattingly (.996)

Hrbek doesn't fare too bad at range factor, though Total Runs is almost certainly a better measure. In 1991, he had exactly zero, which would suggest he was a perfectly average first baseman that year. But let's take a look at the bigger picture. Looking at Total Runs over the course of his career.

1984 was a great year for Hrbek. He finished 2nd in MVP voting (way, way higher than he should have; also, Ripken was robbed). He compiled a WAR of 5.6, really solid. Not as good as Mattingly or Murray, but good. He was also a stellar fielder that year. He compiled .4 wins for his first base defense, which is pretty high for that position. He also had 12 total zone runs above average, a great number that lead all first basemen. In 1984, if someone said Hrbek was the league's best first baseman, they'd have a case. It would be hard to argue he's better than Keith Hernandez, but he'd have an argument.

After 1984, no such argument exists. He did okay in 1985, with 3 total runs, but he was average the next three years, had a great year in 1989 again (8 runs), but then in 1990 he was 7 runs below average. At the end of 1991, Hrbek had compiled 17 total zone runs. He would finish his career with 16 total zone runs.

That number isn't awful by any means, and puts Hrbek 52nd all-time among first basemen. By comparison, Keith Hernandez is the all-time leader with 120 runs, which is otherworldly. Hernandez was retired by 1991, and Olerud was just beginning his great career. But there's one person you may have heard of that was a contemporary of Hrbek's who was okay with the glove: Don Mattingly. He compiled 33 total zone runs, committed fewer errors than Hrbek, and had about the same range factor. Wally Joyner was probably better than both of them. Eddie Murray has an argument as well.

With those big names on the table, why was there so much insistence that Hrbek was this amazing first baseman?  The best explanation I can think of is that Hrbek did not have an athletic looking body. He was no Prince Fielder, but he didn't look like a guy who would make dazzling plays. Ty Cobb famously said that Babe Ruth ran pretty well for a fat guy. Well, Hrbek played first base pretty well for a fat guy. He was never a liability there, except perhaps in 1994, when he hurt a lot of his career numbers with some bad play.

Just for kicks, I decided to compare Hrbek's numbers to those many would say is the best Twins fielding first baseman ever, Doug Mientkiewicz.

Fielding Percentage
H: .994
M: .996

Range Factor/9
H: 9.73
M: 9.41

Total Zone Runs Saved
H: 16 in 13,659 innings
M: 10 in 7635 innings

I did not expect that.

1991 World Series: Game 1

I bought the 1991 World Series DVD a few years ago and finally got around to going through them, one by one. I know we talked once about doing faux game logs for these games, but now that everyone at the WGOM has a family and kids, it's probably not going to happen. But while listening to Buck and McCarver for over twenty hours, I noticed a lot of things that I never would have picked up on when I was eleven years old. I'll spend the next seven weekdays covering each game (because dangit, I have opinions), and hopefully you learn something along the way.

Part 1 -- Game Details

 

                                 1  2  3    4  5  6    7  8  9     R  H  E
                                 -  -  -    -  -  -    -  -  -     -  -  -
    Atlanta Braves               0  0  0    0  0  1    0  1  0     2  6  1
    Minnesota Twins              0  0  1    0  3  1    0  0  x     5  9  1

    PITCHERS: ATL - Leibrandt, Clancy (5), Wohlers (7), Stanton (8)
              MIN - Morris, Guthrie (8), Aguilera (8)

               WP - Jack Morris
	       LP - Charlie Leibrandt
             SAVE - Rick Aguilera

   HOME RUNS: ATL - none
              MIN - Gagne, Hrbek

Part 2 -- Stars of the Game, WPA Style

Jack Morris: 24.4%
Chuck Knoblauch: 13.9%
Ron Gant: 9.6%
Kent Hrbek: 8.9%
Greg Gagne: 8.7%

Morris was great in game seven, but let's not forget he was great in game one. Knoblauch reached base every time, and Hrbek had his one good game before he was murdered by the rest of the Brave lefties.

Game Changing Moment--Greg Gagne's 3-run shot, increasing the Twins chance to win by 11%

Part 3 -- Twins, Voodoo Doll Masters

During the 1987 broadcast, we heard about every eight minutes about lucky the Twins were that they didn't have to face Jack Clark or a healthy Terry Pendleton. And while that got annoying, they were right. Jack Clark should have been MVP, and Pendleton, while not that great in 1987, was a beast compared to Tom "Bat Flip" Lawless. I believe there's a decent chance the Twins lose that series if those players are healthy.

In 1991, the Twins received some similar luck. The Braves lost Otis Nixon (who had zero power but walked and stole 72 bases) to a drug test. They lost two solid relievers in Marvin Freeman and Juan Berenguer to injuries. However, unlike the Cards, the Braves were able to patch these holes with little negative effect. Lonnie "Skates" Smith was a better hitter than Nixon, though significantly worse in the field and on the basepaths. And the Braves picked up Alejandro Pena and called up Mark Wohlers. Wohlers was iffy at best, but their entire pitching staff was deep. If the Braves were hurt by their injuries, it didn't show in the playoffs.

Part 4 -- Kelly Makes Things Harder

The Twins, much like in 87, had no significant injuries. Larkin couldn't run, but otherwise the whole gang was healthy. Despite this, I believe Kelly made a couple of serious mistakes with his roster construction.

Mark Guthrie

I love the fact that Kelly only brought nine pitchers with him. He brought the lackluster David West as insurance for Scott Erickson (or a freak injury) and five relievers, Aguilera, Willis, Bedrosian, Leach, and Guthrie.

Aguilera and Willis were obvious choices. Bedrosian and Leach were okay; I may have chosen Tom Edens over Leach as he had a better WHIP and strikeout rate, but Leach had World Series experience and had that funky delivery which can be nice to have around. Guthrie was the mistake.

The Twins were severely deficient in left-handers, and I understand the need to have one on the roster, even if the only Brave lefty that was terrible against lefties was Sid Bream. But Guthrie was atrocious in 1991. His WHIP (1.602), walk rate (3.8), home run rate (1.0) are all scary. He had a decent strikeout rate (6.6), but not good enough to offset everything else. The worst part, though, is that he was terrible at getting out lefties (337/383/500). Kelly wound up using him four times in the World Series, and he got lucky Guthrie only gave up one run considering he allowed seven base runners in four innings.

Who else, then, should have replaced him on the roster? It should have been an easy choice: 1988 ERA champion Allan Anderson. Now, Allan wasn't much better than Guthrie in 1991. He gave up a bunch of homers and had a higher ERA. But one thing he could still do very well in his final season was get out lefties. How well?  225/265/315 in 117 plate appearances. I would trust him against David Justice.  In fact, I'm surprised Allan didn't make it as a lefty-specialist, but it looks like he completely fell apart in AAA the next couple of years.

Jarvis Brown

The Twins brought sixteen hitters after leading the league in average and OBP, and had a  very solid bench. Al Newman was god-awful, but he was a solid infielder who could backup just about anyone and had been on the 87 roster. Paul Sorrento was an up-and-coming power threat and a good choice for the bench role. Due to a low number of injuries, the Twins were able to bring pretty much every hitter who contributed, except one. Pedro Munoz.

Now, the reason Kelly brought Jarvis Brown on is obvious: Brown was seven for eight in stolen bases, and the Twins had no good base stealers or pinch-runners on the bench. Brown was worthless with the bat and despite entering three games, never attempted a steal. He went 0-2 in mop-up duty in game five. And I'm sure everyone remembers he was due up (instead of Chili Davis) before Gene Larkin won the series.

Pedro was in his second year with the Twins and was a very part-time player. He had an OPS+ of 121, and while he had little plate discipline, he had obvious raw power and decent contact skills. He was also three for three in stolen bases, so he wasn't a statue. He was a terrible defender (negative 42 total zone runs in 517 games), so starting him in left field over Gladden would have been questionable. But as an additional bench option, he would have been very welcome. Now nobody could have predicted how desperate the Twins would need bench options in the series, but having a fast guy to replace your cleanup hitter in a tie game seems really silly.

 

The 50 Best Players not (yet) in the Hall of Fame

On Monday evening Graham Womack, the proprietor of Baseball: Past and Present, published his fourth annual article on the 50 best baseball players not in the Hall of Fame. Graham's list is the product of ballots submitted by over 200 readers, including yours truly (my third year voting). I counted four former Minnesota Twins on the list, but there might be a couple short-time guys I missed. Graham's piece is a massive article, but entirely worth the read.

I really enjoy the way Womack conducts this survey. Voters are first asked to identify who they believe are the best players outside the Hall of Fame (no metrics or other specific criteria are required), and secondly whether the player belongs in the Hall of Fame. This way, apart from the PED issue, there's a fairly clear delineation of where voters believe the Hall of Fame ends and the Hall of Very Good starts.

In sean's WGOM's Take on the Hall of Fame post, Doc expressed his desire to see the median Hall of Famer at each position. I've broken the positions down below, then contextualized the medians with a decent selection of players eligible for Womack's list. Continue reading The 50 Best Players not (yet) in the Hall of Fame

Quick Thoughts on Mauer at First

Last year Mauer hit .324/.404/.476 in 113 games: 75 at catcher, 29 at DH, and 8 at first. Let's assume he does similar in 2014 but with 150 games all at first.

DRS rates Mauer's defense over a full year (unsure if that's 150 or 162 games) at +2 runs; UZR says +8 runs; TZL says +7 runs. I'm going to assume +5 runs.

Extrapolating things a bit to more games, but at first, gives the following rWAR figures.

YearGPARbatRbaserRdpRfieldRposRAAWAARrepRARWAR
201311350826-1162343.817515.4
201415065434-105-12262.922485.3

Almost exactly the same. A large part of that is due to many more plate appearances. I don't know how much his defense will improve at first given experience. DRS really liked him this year, but UZR didn't. If instead he averages +10 runs at first, that's bordering on a six-win season.

One man’s opinion of the top300 Twins-updated with 2013 stats

I stole most of the idea from when Gleeman started his top40 list years ago (still unfinished right?) The below quote is his, and the rest is an exerpt from a book I put together 3 years ago. Some of it is outdated, but I’ve updated the list and stats through 2013 which includes the changes that were made last year to how different sites calculate WAR.

“The rankings only include time spent playing for the Minnesota Twins. In other words, David Ortiz doesn’t get credit for turning into one of the best players in baseball after joining the Red Sox and Paul Molitor doesn’t get credit for being one of the best players in baseball for the Brewers and Blue Jays. The Twins began playing on April 11, 1961, and that’s when these rankings start as well.”

I used a variety of factors, including longevity and peak value. Longevity included how many years the player was a Twin as well as how many plate appearances or innings pitched that player had in those years. For peak value, I looked at their stats, honors, and awards in their best seasons, as well as how they compared to their teammates. Did they lead their team in OPS or home runs or ERA for starters or WPA? If so, that got some bonus points. I factored in postseason heroics, awards (gold gloves, silver sluggers, MVPs, Cy Youngs), statistical achievements (batting titles, home run leaders, ERA champs, etc), and honors (all star appearances), and I looked at team success as well. If you were the #1 starter on a division winning champ, that gave you more points than the #1 starter on a cellar dweller. I looked at some of the advanced stats like WPA, WAR (as calculated by fan graphs and baseball-reference.com), WARP (as calculated by Baseball Prospectus), and Win Shares (as calculated by Bill James). For hitters, I also looked at OPS and the old school triple crown statistics like batting average, home runs, stolen bases, and RBI (and not only where you finished within the AL in any given year, but where you appear on the top25 lists amongst all Twins in the last 50 years). For pitchers I looked at strikeouts, innings pitched, win/loss percentage, ERA as well as ERA). If there was a metric that was used for all 50 years of Twins history, I tried to incorporate it. I tended to give more credit to guys who were starters instead of part time/platoon players, more credit to position players over pitchers (just slightly, but probably unfairly) and starters over relievers (and closers over middle relievers). There’s no formula to my magic, just looking at a lot of factors and in the end going with the gut in all tie-breakers. Up in the top10 I’m looking at All star appearances, Cy Young and MVP votes, batting average or ERA titles or top10 finishes, etc, and placement in the top25 hitting and pitching lists in Twins history as well. In the middle 100s, it’s more about who started a few more years or had 2 good seasons rather than 1 with possibly an occasional all-star berth or top10 finish in SB or strikeouts. Once you’re in the latter half of the 200s there are none of those on anyone’s resume, so its basically just looking at peak season in OPS+ or ERA+, WAR, Win Shares, and who started the most years, had the most at bats, or pitched the most innings. What the player did as a coach, manager, or broadcaster is not taken into consideration for this list, so Tom Kelly or Billy Gardner weren’t able to make the top 300 since they were poor players and Frank Quilici didn’t improve his status due to his managing career.
Continue reading One man’s opinion of the top300 Twins-updated with 2013 stats

Justin Morneau traded

this news probably deserves its own post.

Ken Rosenthal ‏@Ken_Rosenthal
Source: #Pirates acquire Morneau from #Twins for OF Alex Presley.

Morneau leaves the Twins with an MVP award (2006), a second place finish (2008), 3rd on the Twins franchise Home Run list, 5th in RBI, a HR Derby Champ (played under the pseudonym "Jason Morneau") and thousands of fans

Game 92: Twins 10, Yankees 4

Well, I said I wouldn't post another Sunday recap if the game had been a losing effort. I'm glad that didn't even last 1 time through the order! The Twins had 14 hits on the day and cashed in on 2 Yankees errors to score 10 runs. Aaron Hicks hit his 8th Home Run of the year, a 2-out, 3-run shot in the 3rd inning off of C.C. Sabathia who, by the way, took his first loss against the Twins....since nearly ever. He had been 11-0 in his last 12 starts against the Twins.

There's more, if you care to read on...

Continue reading Game 92: Twins 10, Yankees 4