Winter Wonderland: Games of November 3

ARIZONA FALL LEAGUE

MESA 3, SURPRISE 1 IN SURPRISE

Danny Jansen's two-run single in the sixth put Mesa up 3-1.  Mitch Garver was 0-for-3 with a walk for Surprise.  Tanner English was 0-for-3.  Randy Rosario pitched a scoreless inning, giving up one hit.  Mason Melotakis struck out two in a scoreless inning, giving up two hits--his ERA is 1.13 in eight innings.

GLENDALE 2, SCOTTSDALE 1 IN GLENDALE

A throwing error with the bases loaded provided two runs in the fifth for Glendale, and it was all they needed.

PEORIA AT SALT RIVER

Rained out.

VENEZUELAN LEAGUE

ANZOATEGUI 8, LARA 1 IN ANZOATEGUI (GAME 1--7 INNINGS)

Luis Hernandez hit a two-run homer in a four-run fifth that put Anzoategui up 5-1.  Niko Goodrum was 0-for-3 with a walk and two runs for Anzoategui.

LARA 4, ANZOATEGUI 1 IN ANZOATEGUI (GAME 2--7 INNINGS)

Rangel Ravelo broke a scoreless tie with a two-run homer in the fourth and Lara added two more in the sixth.

MARGARITA 3, CARACAS 2 IN CARACAS

Margarita scored three in the fourth and held on to win.  Wilfredo Tovar was 0-for-3 for Caracas and is batting .307.

ZULIA AT MAGALLANES

Postponed due to wet grounds.

DOMINICAN LEAGUE

AGUILAS 5, ORIENTE 4 IN ORIENTE

Danny Richar's two-run double in the fifth broke a 3-3 tie and gave Aguilas enough runs to win.

GIGANTES 6, ESCOGIDO 5 AT GIGANTES (13 INNINGS)

Wilkin Castillo homered in the top of the thirteenth to give Escogido a 5-4 lead, but with the bases-loaded in the bottom of the thirteenth gave the Gigantes the victory.  Daniel Palka was 1-for-5 with a home run and a walk for Escogido.

PUERTO RICAN LEAGUE

SANTURCE 3, MAYAGUEZ 0 IN MAYAGUEZ

Jacob Hannemann tripled and scored in the first and Juan Silva added a two-run double in the sixth.  Kennys Vargas was 0-for-4 for Mayaguez.

CAROLINA 7, AGUADILLA 3 IN AGUADILLA

Aguadilla led 3-0 after three, but Carolina scored four in the fourth and never trailed again.  J. J. Fernandez was 0-for-4 for Carolina and is now batting .375.  Juan Centeno was 1-for-4 for Aguadilla and is batting .071.

MEXICAN LEAGUE

JALISCO 11, HERMOSILLO 8 IN JALISCO

Jalisco scored nine runs in the first and never trailed, although Hermosillo did cut the lead to 9-7 after four.  Jalisco batted thirteen in the first inning, getting five singles, three doubles, and a three-run homer by Art Charles.

OBREGON 3, NAVOJOA 2 IN OBREGON

Carlos Valencia doubled in Matt Juengel to break a 2-2 tie in the eighth.

MEXICALI 6, LOS MOCHIS 5 IN LOS MOCHIS

C. J. Retherford's grand slam capped a five-run eighth that put Mexicali up 6-2.  Los Mochis got within one in the ninth on Sebastian Valle's three-run single-plus-error-plus-error, but Los Mochis did not get the tying run on base.

CULIACAN 3, MAZATLAN 1 IN CULIACAN

Culican scored two in the sixth to break a 1-1 tie.

1987 Rewind: Game Thirty-two

BALTIMORE 10, MINNESOTA 7 IN BALTIMORE

Date:  Tuesday, May 12.

Batting stars:  Tom Brunansky was 3-for-4 with a double, scoring once and driving in three.  Steve Lombardozzi was 3-for-4 with an RBI.

Pitching stars:  None.

Opposition stars:  Fred Lynn was 1-for-4 with a grand slam, his fifth homer.  Larry Sheets was 1-for-1 with a three-run homer, his third.  Dave Van Gorder was 1-for-2 with a home run and a walk.

The game:  A walk and four consecutive singles plated four third-inning runs for the Twins.  The lead was cut to 4-3 after five, but Lombardozzi doubled home a run in the sixth and the Twins scored two in the eighth to go up 7-3.  Starter Frank Viola was still pitching into the eighth, but was replaced by Keith Atherton after a leadoff walk.  He retired the first two batters, but a single and a walk loaded the bases and Jeff Reardon came in.  Lynn greeted him with a grand slam to tie the game.  The Twins went down in order in the top of the ninth.  In the bottom of the ninth, with Reardon still pitching, the Orioles opened the inning with a pair of singles.  The next batter flied out, but Sheets hit a pinch-hit three-run homer to win the game for Baltimore.

Of note:  Kirby Puckett was 1-for-5 with a run and an RBI, dropping his average to .328...Tim Laudner was 1-for-3 with a run and an RBI, raising his average to .071...Viola pitched seven innings, giving up four runs on five hits and a walk with five strikeouts...Baltimore starter Mike Flanagan pitched 5.1 innings, allowing five runs on eight hits and a walk with three strikeouts...Reardon was charged with four runs in two-thirds of an inning, raising his ERA to 10.67.

Record:  The Twins were 17-15, in fourth place, a half-game behind California, Kansas City, and Seattle.

Notes:  Al Newman was at shortstop, with Greg Gagne on the bench...Dan Gladden was the DH, with Roy Smalley out of the lineup...Laudner played first base and batted fifth for some reason...Brunansky was in left field, with Mark Davidson in right.

Player profile:  1987 was by far the best year Larry Sheets ever had.  He hit .316/.358/.563 for an OPS of .921.  His next best OPS was .805, which he had the year before.  A Virginian, he was drafted by Baltimore in the second round in 1978.  He left baseball after the 1980 season, unsure what he wanted to do with his life.  He returned in 1982 and spent the season in Class A.  He was in AA in 1983 and AAA in 1984, getting a September call-up in '84.  He stayed with the Orioles through 1989.  A left-handed batter, he was a platoon DH through 1986, but gradually played more outfield and was pretty much a regular in the lineup in 1987 and 1988.  His 1988 season, however, fell off sharply from 1987, and when he did not rebound significantly in 1989 he was traded to Detroit after the season.  He did somewhat better as a part-time player for the Tigers in 1990, but was allowed to become a free agent after the season.  He apparently did not play in 1991, played in Japan in 1992, played in AAA for Milwaukee in 1993, and was traded to Seattle in early September of that season.  He did little for the Mariners in September, however, and his playing career came to an end.  His son Gavin was drafted in the thirty-seven round by Atlanta in 2014, but chose to go to Wake Forest and play baseball there instead.  At last report, Larry Sheets was a high school baseball coach in Baltimore.

Hamilton Leithauser + Rostam – A 1000 Times

FTLT (the citizen that alerted the citizenry to the likes of Alabama Shakes and Courtney Barnett long before everyone else figured it out, who also used to be a DJ, contributor, and frequent commenter as well as being known as somewhat of a basketball enthusiast (in the case that anyone is unfamiliar)) causally dropped a mention in a FMD a little bit back. I've learned to listen when the hitman does so.

A collaboration between the lead singer of The Walkmen and one of the main cogs of Vampire Weekend, their album is a whirling plunge through genres, eras, and textures, but all with a distinctly original sound that I hope they explore on another album or two. Anyway, this song has been between lowkey to rock-climber's grip stuck in my head for the past few weeks now.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V50OMXcYBcY
Sep 2016

1 vote, average: 10.00 out of 101 vote, average: 10.00 out of 101 vote, average: 10.00 out of 101 vote, average: 10.00 out of 101 vote, average: 10.00 out of 101 vote, average: 10.00 out of 101 vote, average: 10.00 out of 101 vote, average: 10.00 out of 101 vote, average: 10.00 out of 101 vote, average: 10.00 out of 10 (1 votes, average: 10.00 out of 10)
You must be a WGOM Citizen to rate WGOM Videos.
Loading...

Happy Birthday–November 4

Bobby Wallace (1873)
Tommy Leach (1877)
Skeeter Webb (1909)
Carl Sawatski (1927)
Dick Groat (1930)
Tito Francona (1933)
Dick Selma (1943)
Doug Corbett (1952)
Jon Shave (1967)
Eric Karros (1967)
Carlos Baerga (1968)
Kevin Frederick (1976)
Carmen Cali (1978)

We would also like to wish a very happy birthday to davidwatts, yickit, and kalarson.

Continue reading Happy Birthday–November 4

Falvey, Philosophy, & the Future

"Good pitching beats good hitting," the saying goes. "TINSTAAPP," might be the rejoinder.

Derek Falvey no longer works for the reigning American League Champions. As of today Falvey is in charge of the worst team in baseball. The newly-installed Executive Vice President & Chief Baseball Officer of the Minnesota Twins, Falvey has been credited with a substantial role in the development of the pitching program that provided the bedrock of his former team's success. He announced his first hire, Thad Levine, who will be the Twins' General Manager and Senior Vice President. Levine's previous duties in Texas included international scouting, player acquisition, roster composition, contract negotiations, and statistical/financial analysis. Rob Antony, the now-former interim GM, was considered the contracts expert in former GM Terry Ryan's cadre of longtime assistants and former GMs. Antony's new duties have not yet been defined. The continued involvement of Terry Ryan, Bill Smith, Wayne Krivsky, Mike Radcliff, Deron Johnson, Brad Steil, and even Jack Goin appear to be open questions.

As I contemplated the rosters of Cubs and their opponent last night, I felt the first major question of this new era of Twins baseball hit my mind with full force:

Will the Twins follow the pattern of Falvey's old team and stress the development of a raft young pitchers as the prime motivator of a run at contention. The Twins' ballpark might be well-suited to this approach, but the volatility of young arms suggests a substantial amount of assumed risk in that strategy.

Or will Falvey shift gears and attempt to fix a player development program that has left talented young position players spinning their wheels in a constant revolving door between Minnesota and the minor leagues? Said another way, will Falvey's plan be to develop a core of talented young position players like the Cubs, and then buttress it with a pitching staff assembled through smart acquisitions and signings?

Of course, it's simply too early to know. What we'll learn about Falvey's roster construction approach first will be informed by the more mundane, familiar offseason questions: Which veterans are tendered a contract? How does the club approach and weather arbitration? What does the front office say about the 2017 roster?

But it seems worth discussing, in the (small?) window we have before things begin to take shape under Falvey's guidance, the merits and pitfalls of each approach, or how – and to what degree – we might like to see them applied to the organization. This is a pivotal moment in the existence of our favorite franchise. It's the first gust of truly fresh air through a front office that has been intellectually stagnant & compositionally fetid for over a decade, a front office that was working off a plan that traced its origin back to the mid-1980s and its conventions back to pre-integration baseball. The twenty-first century, it seems, may have finally arrived for the Minnesota Twins.

The clubs that concluded the World Series last night offer two compelling patterns. For the first time in a long while, there is an exciting amount of uncertainty around the Twins.

FKB: Financial Planning for Idiots

Not sure if this is a Father Knows Best post, or if it belongs under whatever we called the Nation's recommendations (like what kind of refrigerator, cell phone, pocket knife, stereo system, etc. we use or recommend... we had that, didn't we? [updated! thanks sean]), whatever, I digress. I owed the basement a FKB post in July and didn't make time to do it. This is about midway between Philo's Oct. posting and Nibbs' November posting timeframe, so I'm dropping it here.

My wife and I have been working through some of the adulting items recently highlighted by hj and others. Over the past 2-3 years, we've managed to knock out quite a few major items (started 529's, got the life insurance and retirement accounts up and running and last week we finalized our estate planning (will and health care directives). I've found the citizenry's conversations about kids & college, aging parents, home purchasing and personal finances in general here to be very useful. The conversations, coupled with the encouragement to tackle these now rather than later (by those further along in the process of growing up) has been a catalyst to my willingness to actually get started (so thank you).

I consolidated and shared that most recent discussion with my wife. For clarity, I eliminated attributions, unrelated/side-bar lte's, and the spoilered FZ stuff and made some minor edits and deletions. (Any mistakes/errors or misrepresentations are mine.) She had trouble following the conversation (doesn't know how conversations work in the basement) so I set it so that each new indent represents a response to the previous comment, and those aligned left represent a "new" piece of input.

She responded with her notes from a financial planner presentation her employer brought in. I'm sharing both here for posterity.

WGOM DISCUSSION THREAD

Important #1: if your company has a 401(k), start putting money into it now, especially if there is matching. Every time you get a raise, kick it up another 1%

Important #2: pay off your credit cards and don't use more than you can pay off each month

RE: #1. The only thing I'd caution is that, if there isn't matching, sometimes it can be more valuable to pay down debt now first. If you can afford to do both, do. But if interest on debt > rate of return on 401(k) (or even less, depending on credit score effects and desire for future borrowing, i.e. mortgage), then it makes sense to pay down debt first.

Agreed. but don't put off 401(k) long -- the earlier you start, the better.

That's one thing I did do, though I only contribute the minimum to get the maximum match from my employer.

Right, and if there's an employer match, that's always the better way to go.

Index funds are your friend. They are the closest thing to following "the market" there is and have incredibly low fees. I can't comment on which one to pick as my expertise is very limited.

401(k)s are generally your friend, at least to the point that ostensibly your company is helping you. Or maybe it sucks and you're screwed. John Oliver featured them a few months ago on his show. You can skip to the end for his (swearing!) video containing tips. Another option would be Roth IRAs.

That's all I've got.

Aye.

If you have high-interest debt, pay it off first. This is a low-interest environment. If you are carrying balances on your credit cards, pay them off ASAP and pay in full every month. Brown bag your lunch.

Then, what sean and others have said. If you have a match on a 401K, that's free money. Take as much of it as you can and put it into no-load index funds. If a Roth 401K is an option at your work, take advantage when you are young and your marginal tax rate is lowest. Dollar-cost averaging is your friend. Ditto on 529 accounts for the kids. Start now. If you have loose change left over after these things, then Roth IRA.

Being a quasi- government employee, I'm paying into a state retirement system. The required contribution is 13.2% of gross earnings (6.6% contributed by employee & employer). The employee percentage is deducted pre-tax. Assuming my state retirement system still exists when I retire (shakier than I want to admit given who runs the state right now), should I still consider other sources of retirement income (401k, IRA)? There is a TSA program , but it doesn't have an employer match. I guess what I'm really asking is, should I be thinking about socking away additional resources for retirement, or putting things away for the Poissonnier's education?

I don't know if you have the option for a 401(k) because I recall they are employer sponsored. I could be wrong. That leaves you IRAs. Roth is a popular option but you're limited to $5,500 of contributions a year (this applies to traditional IRAs too but there are still differences). Looks like a primary difference between the two is that an IRA can have tax benefits for that year but you get taxed when you withdraw while a Roth has no tax benefits that year but withdrawal is tax-free (broadly speaking, limitations still apply). You can convert a traditional IRA to a Roth but not the reverse. You do get taxed but you can do it at a time that is advantageous to you. I recall either now or recently there were some tax breaks about that. If you think your tax rate today will be lower than the future, a Roth makes more sense. If you think your tax rate in the future will be lower, then a traditional makes more sense.

Note, I am not a fiduciary and only play one on the internet. If it were me, I think I would opt for a Roth IRA and a 529. How much goes into either is up to you. I think I would bias it to the IRA.

There's a lot of really helpful thought in that answer. I can understand why biasing toward the IRA makes sense. Unless I move into an administrative position my earnings are going to max out at a level where some financial aid is still pretty likely, which perhaps lowers the pressure to put more into a 529 to offset the hit from our expected contribution at a higher income level.

As a government employee, I view my pension (and corresponding university pension, since I am a former member of the liberal elite) as a highly stable baseline of retirement income, similar to Social Security (which I also will have). So my allocations to other investments should be read in light of that low-risk baseline. I'm pretty much 100 percent in stocks via index funds, using the pensions and social security as my asset type diversification in my portfolio (I own several different kinds of index funds).

Your mileage may vary on the risks associated with government pensions. For example, last year I extracted all of my money from the Illinois university retirement system and put it into an IRA, because I was worried about bankruptcy in that state.

I have a 401k (no match) and my wife and I both have Roth IRAs, in addition to my traditional IRA. I expect that our retirement income will not dip all that much from our current income, so the Roth makes more sense than a traditional. Plus, you don't have to draw on it at all if you don't want to in retirement (and thus can use it in estate planning). I will probably look to roll over chunks of that traditional IRA once the Girl is done with college and off the dole.

We invested heavily in 529s for the kids. Both went/are going to Fancy Pants schools, and our income is too high for Pell Grants. 529s are the best vehicle for someone like us to minimize the product of portfolio management headaches, fiscal discipline and tax exposure in planning for college. Whatever you do, try to avoid putting any money in UGMA/UTMA accounts for the kiddies. That is a recipe for minimizing financial aid. Just keep those assets in your own name until they are college seniors, then gift them startup funds if that's what you want to accomplish.

more on 529s vs UGMA/UTMA for saving for college.

You can't go wrong with 529s when there is any doubt. In MO, we even got a state tax break

The 529 contributions are deductible in Wisconsin as well. I have money taken out once a month for each kid automatically, which makes it easier to get it in there.

I think even the earnings were state tax deductible on withdrawal, too

From my reading of this article it seems like you can recharacterize from a Roth to a traditional only for a limited time after recharacterizing the traditional to a Roth. And, the always correct Wikipedia lists an advantage of traditional IRAs as recharacterization to a Roth. But I could be wrong!

Yea, I think you are right. Recharacterization is basically an "undo" of a conversion from traditional to Roth. Thanks for clarifying.

Or. Or.

Through a Roth recharacterization, you either change a contribution from a Roth IRA to another type of IRA or nullify a previous Roth conversion. It's as if the contribution or conversion never occurred in the Roth IRA.

Vanguard reports a recharacterization on Form 1099-R as a distribution from the Roth IRA and on Form 5498 as a contribution to the non-Roth IRA. In Box 7 of Form 1099-R, you'll see an "R" for a contribution or conversion made for 2015 and recharacterized in 2016 or an "N" for a contribution or conversion made for 2016 and recharacterized in 2016. Contributions and conversions for 2015 that are recharacterized in 2016 will be reported on 2016 tax forms, which will be distributed in 2017.

You can still recharacterize contributions or conversions for a tax year on or before your federal tax return filing deadline for that tax year, including extensions, even if you already filed your tax return. However, you may need to file an amended return for the tax year in which the original contribution or conversion was made.

Towards my original question though, any thoughts/tips on using professionals?

There may be some value in seeing a financial planner once, to get some general analysis and advice. But brokerage fees and management fees from actively managing your portfolio? Not so much.

The best advice you can probably get: (1) start investing as early as you can, even if small. (2) dollar-cost average. Don't get caught up in short-term market fluctuations unless you like to entertain yourself that way. (3) focus on no-load index funds. (4) don't frick with your investment strategy. More people lose more money by buying and selling too frequently than they do by letting investments ride.

Here's some sage advice from Time's Money Magazine:

Shop locally. As long as you have at least $250,000 to invest—a typical minimum—see what a local financial planner charges. That face-to-face help may be less or no more than what you’d pay for a fund investment advice program. By the end of 2015, Vanguard’s Personal Advisor Services, which costs 0.3% plus costs of underlying investments, should be widely available.

Pay for advice once. If all you need is guidance at the starting gate, you can hire an adviser by the hour instead of spending 1% to 2% a year. You might pay $800 to $1,500 for a one-time plan.

But the scale there should tell you a bit about when it might be worth having such an advisor. IMO.

Agreed. Financial advice early on is good; financial advice later on is a necessity

We absolutely have a financial advisor, and have for over fifteen years now, although we use them more actively the past few years. Of course I'm 10 years or so from thinking of retirement. You don't necessarily need one early on, but keep socking that retirement/college money so that when time comes to start thinking retirement your financial advisor will have something to work with.

If you can find a good financial advisor (when the time comes), definitely do it. It can make a big difference when it comes to when to draw SS or from your IRA/401(k), etc., as well as balancing your investments for the long haul.

I have used a professional for the last seven or eight years (we set up a retirement account for her and rolled over my 401k from my old employer in the beginning, we've added on some other accounts since then: rainy day fund, potential college fund, etc). We've been happy with it, in that our guy (don't know cost, I'm afraid) has kept an eye on things so that our actual interaction with it can be relatively minimal (twice yearly appointments and reading the balance sheets when they come to us). We're good with basic finances, but actual capital 'I' investing is something that neither of us want to put in the time to being good at.

B: Jack Bogle might have some useful things to say about basic investing.

Yes you should use a professional financial planner. Do your parents? Siblings? In-laws? Ask who they use. That's a place to start. Do some research on fees and ask them questions. Find one you feel comfortable with, and hopefully through recommendations, feel like you can trust.


NOTES MY WIFE TOOK (yes ... this is how she actually takes notes. In this regard, I'm proud that she puts me to shame).

Personal Finance Philosophy – 5 things

  1. Earn a decent living
    1. This equates to the ability to cover your mortgage, car and vacations
    2. Once you reach that tipping point, making more money will not make you happier
    3. Making less money will make you less happy
  2. Spend Less than You Make
  3. Take Money you don’t spend , save and invest à make your $ work for you
    1. Avoid being ‘Financially Fragile’ (i.e. not having enough liquid savings to cover large unplanned expenses)
    2. Max out your 401K (match)
    3. Save more when you can (e.g. years with larger bonuses)
  4. Protect financial Work (or was it worth)
    1. Life Insurance (not when single, but when married and/or with kids)
    2. Disability Insurance (especially when single and/or when sole earner)
    3. Basic Estate Plan (again, critical with kids. . . should cost $1000 or less) – includes:
      1. Will
      2. Healthcare Proxy
      3. Durable Power of Attorney
      4. Healthcare Directive
  5. Give Back
    1. Volunteer, Donations etc.

Investments

  1. Control what you can control
    1. Investment Expense (i.e. “Fees)
      1. Index Funds and/or ETFS
    2. Amount of Risk you’re taking
      1. Reduce your risk over time. . . . . especially close to the life event (e.g. retirement/collected)
      2. If you invest in “Target Date” funds (e.g. Lifepath Funds) invest all or none – don’t go halfsies

Term vs. Permanent (aka Cash Value) Life Insurance

  1. Start with “Term” Life Insurance
    1. Covers your bases until you accrue enough in retirement accounts to cover your bases
    2. Or Covers your family until they are independent
    3. Max out the Group Term Benefit (e.g. Target allows you to add up to 6X salary, do that – it’s cheap)
    4. Look at Life Insurance Worksheet online to determine “How Much)
  2. Permanent
    1. Use when your need for Life Insurance won’t end (e.g. when you have a disabled/dependent child)
    2. Jean is not a fan of Permanent Life Insurance as an investment vehicle
      1. Exception = Immediate Annuity – e.g. to manage income during retirement

Savings for College

  1. Retirement should come first
  2. 529s generally better than Roth IRAs (for this purpose)
    1. 529s can save more $
    2. Roth IRA – can choose to use for college OR retirement
    3. Both grow tax free
  3. Research 529s à find the best one
    1. Savingsforcollege.com - - ranks 529 plans
  4. In general better to ‘Divide and Conquer’ your savings
    1. You are more likely to meet your goals if you have different savings buckets for different goals

More on Retirement Savings - Steps

  1. Emergency fund – always have a minimum of $2000 liquid
    1. Save 3X monthly expenses for Dual Income
    2. Save 6X monthly expenses for Single Income
  2. Max out your 401K first – at the “Match”
  3. Pay down debt that has an interest rate higher than your savings returns
  4. Invest everything else in the future
    1. Max out total 401K to Yearly Limit (in 2015 = $18K)
    2. And/Or invest in Roth
  5. Automate everything you can (savings, investments, debt payments)
  6. Guidelines for how much you should have saved (per “Fidelity)
    1. Age 35 = 1X current salary
    2. Age 45 = 3X
    3. Age 55 = 5X
    4. Age 65 = 8X
  7. Other:
    1. Longevity rates are going up
      1. Plan on Living to 95
      2. Plan on needing 85% of Pre-Retirement Income

Pros and Cons of EDCP (Executive Deferred Compensation Plan)

  1. More than $18K allowed and not eligible for IRA
  2. Longevity rates are going up

 

Financial Planning – When and How Often?

  1. 1X year – basic financial physical
    1. What you earn, vs. Own. Vs. Owe – review that these are all moving in the right direction
    2. Progress on Retirement Goals (calculate)
  2. 3X year – check credit report
    1. Look for Identity Theft and take action ASAP
      1. Annualcreditreport.com
      2. Read/review your statements
    2. Know your credit score (but don’t need to check as often) 720 = Good; 760+ = Great

 

Saving for College – Should Kids take the Loans or Parents

  1. Have the kids borrow some of the money (if you haven’t saved enough already and/or financial aid doesn’t cover)
    1. Have them borrow no more in total than what they expect to make in their first year
    2. Borrow w/ Federal Loans when possible
    3. You can help repay their loans.

Aging Parents

  1. Unlike Kids/College, - ‘We’ help b/c there is no other choice (e.g. ‘Financial Aid’)
  2. Important to understand their ‘need’
    1. Open and Honest Communication
  3. Have a Social Security Strategy
    1. Delay tapping into Social Security as long as Possible
      1. Grows @ 8% from age 62 to 70
    2. This is a point where it makes sense to pay for advice
      1. Review: maximizemysocialsecurity.com
      2. There are social security estimators available; seek them out

Risk Adverse? Where else to save

  1. Credit Unions à interest bearing accounts
  2. Government Bonds
  3. Note: Regular savings accounts equate to losing money after inflation/taxes, etc.

 

Using 401K or Personal Investments for Debt Reduction

  1. BAD – have to pay $ back within 60 days if leave company (whether by choice or not) – otherwise pay tax penalty
  2. Better to ‘pull back’ on regular contributions and pay back debt that way

What to do if I’m a Named Guardian

  1. Understand financial responsibility; Do the Parents have life Insurance?

Kids, Finances and Allowance – when to start, how to structure and how much?

  1. Start at age 5
  2. $1 (week)
  3. Add $1 every year
    1. Think of things you want them to start buying themselves
  4. Help them with “Give, Save, Spend” parameters
    1. Always save 10% - get them in this habit early

Buying and Selling Stock – when?

  1. The advisor doesn’t manage $ this way - -- - she invests in diversified funds
    1. Other investors sell when stock price drops 10-15%
      1. Exception is when price is affected by an exaggerated news story
      2. And/or the Entire Market drops

When do you go to a Financial Advisor?

  1. When do you go to a Financial Advisor?
    1. When your financial life gets more complicated
      1. Kids, homes, raises/promotions,

1987 Rewind: Game Thirty-one

MINNESOTA 10, BALTIMORE 4 IN BALTIMORE

Date:  Monday, May 11.

Batting stars:  Tom Brunansky was 3-for-5 with a home run (his fifth) and a walk, driving in three.  Tom Nieto was 2-for-5 with a three-run home run and a double,   Gary Gaetti was 3-for-4 with a walk and three runs.

Pitching star:  Bert Blyleven pitched a complete game, giving up four runs (three earned) on eight hits and a walk with five strikeouts.

Opposition stars:  Fred Lynn was 2-for-4 with a home run, his fourth.  Eddie Murray was 1-for-4 with a home run, his eighth.  Cal Ripken was 1-for-4 with a home run, his tenth.

The game:  Nieto hit a three-run homer as part of a four-run second that put the Twins up 5-0.  Brunansky hit a two-run homer in the third to make it 7-1.  The Orioles never got closer than five runs after that.

Of note:  Kirby Puckett was 1-for-5 with an RBI and was batting .333.  Baltimore starter Scott McGregor lasted only 2.1 innings, allowing seven runs (six earned) on six hits and three walks with no strikeouts.

Record:  The Twins were 17-14, in third place, a half-game behind California and Seattle.

Notes:  Al Newman started at shortstop in place of Greg Gagne, who was used as a defensive replacement late in the game...Mark Davidson was in right field, with Brunansky the DH and Roy Smalley out of the lineup..Solo home runs didn't hurt Blyleven in this game, as he left pitches up to Lynn, Murray, and Ripken to account for the only three earned runs he gave up...This was Blyleven's second complete game in seven starts.  He would have eight on the season...This is another case of a complete game that would never happen in today's game.

Player profile:  Tony Arnold relieved McGregor and pitched 4.2 innings, giving up two runs.  I have absolutely zero memory of him.  He was a Texan, born in El Paso, went to high school in Irving, and attended the University of Texas.  He was a tenth round draft choice of the Orioles in 1981 and remained in their organization through 1987.  A right-hander, he was a starter for most of his minor league career, but when he struggled in AAA he moved to the bullpen.  He made his big-league debut in August of 1986 and pitched well enough for the Orioles in eleven appearances.  He started the 1987 season with Baltimore and was consistently inconsistent, having some good outings but mixing in enough bad ones that one would imagine the Orioles never really felt they could count on him.  After consecutive poor outings in early July he was sent to AAA.  He came back as a September call-up, but never made it back to the majors after that.  He spent 1988-89 in the minors with the Dodgers and then his playing career was over.  He has stayed in baseball as a minor league pitching coach, in the Dodgers organization from 1990-92 and since then with Cleveland.  One suspects he may have had a hand in developing some of the pitchers we've watched in the World Series this year.  He was the pitching coach of the Akron Rubber Ducks in 2016.  Given how long he's been involved in baseball, I feel like I should have heard of him, but if I ever did, I forgot.  He's had a pretty good coaching career, though, so good for him.